| Niyamam AI

Displaying 17841 - 17845 of 21904

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Rajan vs Saju et al regarding suit not pressed.

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 55/2023

2025-01-30

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Saithali vs Ayishakutty regarding Property Delivery

Execution Petition

EP 273/2019

Malappuram

2019-11-29

0 years, 4 months, 9 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Suhara vs Rasheed regarding permission to sue as indigent person.

Original Petition

ORIGINAL PETITION (PAUPER) No. 27 OF 2018

2019-11-29

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Secretary vs Madhusoodanan et al regarding EP 206/2019

Execution Petition

KLML130004712019

Tirur, Malappuram

2019-11-29

0 years, 5 months, 22 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Secretary , Perumanna Klari Service Co-operative Bank vs Ranjth Babu Eranhikkal regarding execution petition

Execution Petition

EP 212/2018

Malappuram

2019-11-29

1 years, 2 months, 2 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9650

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

23%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs frequently failed to pay necessary court fees (batta), leading to case dismissals.

Found in 23 cases (23%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Failure to present adequate evidence to support claims resulted in dismissals across numerous cases.

Found in 19 cases (19%) High Impact

Absence of Petitioner

Many cases were dismissed due to the petitioner's absence during hearings or lack of representation.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

Failure to Take Steps

Plaintiffs often did not take necessary procedural steps, like issuing notices, resulting in case dismissals.

Found in 13 cases (13%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Presented

Absence of Petitioner

Failure to Take Steps

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?