Case Summary
Saithali is the decree holder and Ayishakutty is the judgment debtor. The case involved the delivery of property as per the decree.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Execution Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court ordered the delivery of the property as requested in the execution petition. The execution petition was subsequently closed.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The property was delivered as per the court's decree.
The property was delivered as per the court's decree.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The property was delivered as per the court's decree.
The property was delivered as per the court's decree.
Supporting Evidence
Property delivered as per the decree.
Judgment Evidence:
Property delivered. EP closed
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Saithali
- Party Age
- 67
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Ayishakutty
- Party Age
- 72
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- SREEKALA SUDHEESH
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Execution Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
EP
Case Code Year
2019