| Niyamam AI

Displaying 18546 - 18550 of 21904

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Therattil Karappan's children vs Therattil Karappan's children regarding partition.

Civil Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 111 OF 2018

Tirur Taluk

2019-01-24

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Secretary , Perumanna Klari Service Co-operative Bank vs Salif Paredath et al regarding judgment debt

Execution Petition

EP 211/2018

Malappuram

2019-01-19

0 years, 3 months, 22 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Sulaiman Puthiyil vs Mohammed regarding Interlocutory Application

Interlocutory Application

Original Suit No. 284 of 2013

2019-01-23

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Asir. M vs Rashid. P.P regarding offence under Negotiable Instrument Act.

Criminal Case

S.T. No:89/2017

Tirur, Malappuram

2019-01-25

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Hussain vs Shamsiya regarding offence under N.I. Act.

Criminal Case

S.T. No:143/2017

Tirur

2019-01-25

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9650

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

34%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs frequently failed to pay the court fee (batta), leading to dismissals for default.

Found in 34 cases (34%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence

Absence of necessary evidence to support claims often resulted in petitions being dismissed.

Found in 26 cases (26%) Medium Impact

Non-Payment of Required Documents

Failure to produce required documents or affidavits led to many cases being dismissed for default.

Found in 20 cases (20%) Medium Impact

No Steps Taken

Inaction by the plaintiffs to advance their cases, such as failing to issue notices, often caused dismissals.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence

Non-Payment of Required Documents

No Steps Taken

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?