Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 111 OF 2018

Case between Therattil Karappan's children vs Therattil Karappan's children regarding partition.

Court
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Judge
Smt.NIMMI.K.K.
Order Date
2019-01-24
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves the children of Therattil Karappan seeking a partition of property. The court heard the suit and recorded terms of a lawful compromise.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit as per the lawful terms of compromise petition. The parties reached an agreement regarding the partition.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit as per the lawful terms of compromise petition. The parties reached an agreement regarding the partition.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The terms of the compromise petition were lawful and recorded by the court.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The terms of the compromise petition were lawful and recorded by the court.
Supporting Evidence
Terms of compromise petition are lawful. Hence recorded.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence recorded. And suit decreed as per terms of Razi.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Appu
Party Age
54
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sulochana
Party Age
51
Relation
W/o Anthyalan Parambil Gopi
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Janu
Party Age
60
Relation
W/o Padannayil Velayudhan
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Janaki
Party Age
57
Relation
W/o Vettath Chakkan
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Devayani
Party Age
48
Relation
W/o Ooralath Haridasan
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. M.Bhavesh
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. V.Sreeraj
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Suit decreed as per terms of Razi.
Evidence:
Suit for partition. Plaintiff represented. IA 2480/18 filed u/o 23 CPC. Terms of compromise petition are lawful. Hence recorded.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Therattil Karappan's children vs Therattil Karappan's children regarding partition.
Case Code Year
Case between Therattil Karappan's children vs Therattil Karappan's children regarding partition.

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur Taluk
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Tue, 01/01/2019 - 12:00
To
Thu, 01/31/2019 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Hamza vs Erattaparambil Hamza et al regarding petition allowance with costs
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Mullanmadakkal Mammi vs Beeran Haji et al regarding petition on medical grounds
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Vettikkat Parikkuzhiyil Beerali vs Thayyil Kader Haji regarding unknown matter
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between P.Damkumar vs Palakkavalappil Puthiyamaliyekkal Gulam Ali et al regarding default
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Muhammed Thameem vs Muhammed Abdul Noor regarding Default Judgment
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Civil Suit Defendant Won