| Niyamam AI

Displaying 18521 - 18525 of 21904

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Shaji et al vs Rajan et al regarding Mandatory Injunction

Mandatory Injunction

ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 187 OF 2015

2019-01-04

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Secretary, Thennala Service Co-operative Bank Limited. vs Thareek et al regarding decree execution.

Execution Petition

EP 160/2018

Malappuram

2019-01-09

0 years, 5 months, 16 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Secretary, Thennala Service Co-operative Bank vs Thanujosh.K et al regarding Decree Execution.

Execution Petition

EP 168/2018

Malappuram

2019-01-09

0 years, 5 months, 13 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Muhammad Faisal vs Nafeesu Umma regarding execution proceedings

Execution Petition

EP 224/2018

Tirur,Malappuram

2019-01-10

0 years, 3 months, 6 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Secratary vs Muhammed Shafi et al regarding EP 261/2018

Execution Petition

KLML130007822018

Malappuram

2019-01-10

0 years, 1 months, 25 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9650

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

25%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs repeatedly failed to pay required batta fees, resulting in case dismissals.

Found in 25 cases (25%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Insufficient evidence to support claims or prove means of the respondents led to dismissals.

Found in 24 cases (24%) High Impact

No Steps Taken in Cases

Plaintiffs often failed to take necessary procedural steps, causing cases to be dismissed for default.

Found in 21 cases (21%) High Impact

Absence of Petitioners in Court

Frequent lack of representation in court by plaintiffs resulted in case dismissals.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Presented

No Steps Taken in Cases

Absence of Petitioners in Court

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?