Case Summary
The case involves a decree holder, Secratary, and judgment debtors, Muhammed Shafi and others. The execution petition was dismissed as the representatives of the first and second parties were reported abroad.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Execution Petition
Final Judgment
No
The execution petition was dismissed due to the absence of the representatives of the judgment debtors who were reported abroad.
Key Reasoning:
The representatives of the judgment debtors were not present.
The representatives of the judgment debtors were not present.
Why Defendant Won:
The representatives of the judgment debtors were not present.
The representatives of the judgment debtors were not present.
Supporting Evidence
The representatives of the judgment debtors were reported abroad, which led to the dismissal of the execution petition.
Judgment Evidence:
ORDER Dh represented R1 and R2 reported abroad. Hence EP stands dismisssed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Secratary
- Party Age
- 1
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Muhammed Shafi
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Muhammed Haneefa
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- P. Ajayakumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Execution Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Secratary vs Muhammed Shafi et al regarding EP 261/2018
Case Code Year
Case between Secratary vs Muhammed Shafi et al regarding EP 261/2018