| Niyamam AI

Displaying 4456 - 4460 of 15299

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Gopakumar et al vs Chellappa Panicker et al regarding restoration of a suit.

Restoration Petition

Restoration Petition No.69/23 in O.S. 255/2016

Vaikom Taluk

2025-07-01

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Vaikom Urban Co-operative Society Ltd. vs Preethy Mathew et al regarding Execution of Decree

Execution Petition

EP 58/2023

Vaikom Taluk

2025-07-01

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between The Ullala Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd. vs Xavier et al regarding Execution Petition

Execution Petition

EP.No.76/2022

Vaikom

2025-07-01

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Aravidakshan et al vs Ambujakshi et al regarding execution petition

Execution Petition

E. P. No. 48/2021 in A.R.C. 311/2010

Vaikom Taluk

2025-07-03

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Kappumthala Service Co-operative Bank No.K 142 vs Deepak Mathew et al regarding Execution Petition

Execution Petition

E. P. No. 124/2022

Vaikom Taluk

2025-07-03

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

39%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 15,022 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 4.2 years

Settlement Likelihood 14%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 574 cases)
Sale deed (in 480 cases)
Tax receipt (in 375 cases)
Land Tax Receipt (in 183 cases)
Death Certificate (in 182 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 5903
Defendant Won: 8099

8248

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

35%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Absence of Plaintiffs in Court

Plaintiffs frequently failed to appear in court, leading to dismissal of cases for default.

Found in 35 cases (35%) High Impact

Failure to Provide Evidence

Plaintiffs often did not present necessary evidence to support their claims, resulting in dismissals.

Found in 22 cases (22%) Medium Impact

Non-Payment of Required Costs

Cases were dismissed when plaintiffs failed to pay mandated costs, affecting their claims.

Found in 20 cases (20%) Medium Impact

Lack of Representation

Many cases were dismissed due to lack of representation for plaintiffs during hearings.

Found in 17 cases (17%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Absence of Plaintiffs in Court

Failure to Provide Evidence

Non-Payment of Required Costs

Lack of Representation

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?