| Niyamam AI

Displaying 3516 - 3520 of 15105

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Lalitha et al vs Sasikala et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.

Civil Suit

OS. No. 666/2015

Kollam

2025-08-18

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Artech Palm Grove Owners Association vs Sirajudheen regarding realisation of money

Civil Suit

OS. No. 910/2023

Kollam

2025-08-19

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Aravindakshan Pillai vs Tomy Joseph regarding Realization of Money

Civil Suit

OS. No. 406/2018

Kollam

2025-08-19

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Murunthal Service Cooperative Bank Ltd et al vs Gopakumar et al regarding dismissal of petition for default.

Civil Case

EP.No. 30/2024

Kollam

2025-08-19

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between M/s.Canara Bank et al vs Kum. Soumya Ravi et al regarding Realization of Money

Civil Suit

OS. No. 141/2023

Kollam District

2025-08-19

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

39%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 15,022 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 4.2 years

Settlement Likelihood 14%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 574 cases)
Sale deed (in 480 cases)
Tax receipt (in 375 cases)
Land Tax Receipt (in 183 cases)
Death Certificate (in 182 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 5903
Defendant Won: 8099

8137

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

20%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Lack of Evidence Presented

Plaintiffs often failed to present sufficient evidence to support their claims, leading to case dismissals.

Found in 20 cases (20%) Medium Impact

Plaintiff's Absence in Court

Many cases were dismissed due to the plaintiffs not being present, indicating a lack of commitment to the case.

Found in 36 cases (36%) High Impact

Default Due to Non-Payment

Several cases were dismissed for plaintiffs failing to pay necessary fees or costs as required by the court.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

Failure to Produce Documents

Plaintiffs frequently failed to produce requested documents that were critical for their claims, resulting in dismissals.

Found in 26 cases (26%) High Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Lack of Evidence Presented

Plaintiff's Absence in Court

Default Due to Non-Payment

Failure to Produce Documents

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?