Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No. 666/2015

Case between Lalitha et al vs Sasikala et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.

Court
Munsiff Court, Kollam
Judge
Smt. Sofia.T.A.
Order Date
2025-08-18
Duration
Case Closed
Mon, 08/18/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, Lalitha and Chandrasenan, filed a suit for a permanent prohibitory injunction. The matter was settled between the parties in a mediation session.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court accepted the compromise reached between the parties and decreed the suit in its terms. The court fees paid by the plaintiffs will be refunded.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Refund of court fees paid by the Plaintiffs.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court accepted the compromise reached between the parties and decreed the suit in its terms. The court fees paid by the plaintiffs will be refunded.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Parties had adjusted the plaintiff claim as a whole by the said compromise.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Parties had adjusted the plaintiff claim as a whole by the said compromise.
Supporting Evidence
I have gone through the compromise and I am satisfied that the parties had adjusted the plaintiff claim as a whole by the said compromise.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence the compromise is accepted and the suit is decreed in its terms.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Lalitha
Party Age
47
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Chandrasenan
Party Age
56
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sasikala
Party Age
52
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Rajendran
Party Age
50
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mayadevi
Party Age
43
Relation
D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sivaraj. S
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Rajeev M.P
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Usha Kumari
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Anjali Devi P.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Renjith Thomas
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The suit is decreed in its terms as per the compromise.
Evidence:
Hence the compromise is accepted and the suit is decreed in its terms.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Lalitha et al vs Sasikala et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
Case Code Year
Case between Lalitha et al vs Sasikala et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.

Case Flags

Adalath Resolved
Out-of-Court Settlement

Quick Facts

Location
Kollam
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Case Filed
Case Closed
Mon, 08/18/2025 - 12:00
From
Tue, 07/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Vijayendran, Chithra vs Yamunadevi regarding review of order
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Navasudeen.S vs Sira Group regarding review of an earlier order
Court of the Munsiff, Kollam
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sajeev vs T.Unnikrishna Pillai regarding setting aside an exparte decree.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Gopakumar vs K.S.Abdul Manaf regarding Realisation of Money
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM.
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Bank of India vs Shibina. S et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won