| Niyamam AI

Displaying 2451 - 2455 of 15105

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Sreedevi vs Ambily Roshan et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 252/2024

2025-02-21

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Manoharan vs Ramadas regarding mandatory injunction to vacate property

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 367/2018

Ernakulam

2025-02-21

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Union Bank of India vs M/s Eleonore regarding realization of money

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 65/2021

Ernakulam

2025-02-20

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Shanoj R vs Joseph Augustin et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Civil Suit

O.S. No.892/2021

2025-02-20

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Cable T V Operators Association (COA) et al vs Anilal Govindan et al regarding rejection of plaint under Order VII Rule 11 of CPC

Civil Suit

O.S. No.717/2023

Ernakulam, Kerala

2025-02-19

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

39%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 15,022 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 4.2 years

Settlement Likelihood 14%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 574 cases)
Sale deed (in 480 cases)
Tax receipt (in 375 cases)
Land Tax Receipt (in 183 cases)
Death Certificate (in 182 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 5903
Defendant Won: 8099

8137

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

34%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Failure to Appear or Represent

Plaintiffs frequently did not appear in court or lacked representation, leading to case dismissals.

Found in 34 cases (34%) High Impact

Non-Payment of Costs or Fees

Many cases were dismissed due to plaintiffs failing to pay required costs or fees within specified timelines.

Found in 24 cases (24%) Medium Impact

Lack of Necessary Evidence

Plaintiffs often failed to provide sufficient evidence to support their claims, resulting in dismissals.

Found in 22 cases (22%) Medium Impact

Default Due to Procedural Failures

Default petitions were dismissed due to plaintiffs' failure to follow procedural requirements, like issuing notices.

Found in 20 cases (20%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Failure to Appear or Represent

Non-Payment of Costs or Fees

Lack of Necessary Evidence

Default Due to Procedural Failures

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?