Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 252/2024

Case between Sreedevi vs Ambily Roshan et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Court
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Needi. K. Dinamany
Order Date
2025-02-21
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Sreedevi, is seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against her cousin and uncle who are allegedly threatening her right to possess her property. The defendants coerced a relative into transferring part of the property and are accused of trespassing and making threats.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The suit is decreed in favor of the plaintiff, granting her a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants from trespassing her property and ordering them to pay the costs of the suit.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Permanent prohibitory injunction from trespassing and committing any waste or damages in the plaint schedule property; costs of the suit to plaintiff.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit is decreed in favor of the plaintiff, granting her a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants from trespassing her property and ordering them to pay the costs of the suit.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff established her case through unchallenged oral and documentary evidence.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff established her case through unchallenged oral and documentary evidence.
Supporting Evidence
The apprehension of plaintiff is well founded. Therefore from the documents produced and proof affidavit which remain unchallenged, I am satisfied that plaintiff has established her case. The unchallenged oral and documentary evidence is sufficient to grant a decree in favour of plaintiff.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, suit is decreed on the following terms. Defendants are restrained by a permanent prohibitory injunction from trespassing and committing any waste or any damages in the plaint schedule property. Defendants are directed to pay costs of the suit to plaintiff.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sreedevi
Party Age
31
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ambily Roshan
Party Age
30
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Roshan A K
Party Age
56
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Sale deed No. 621/2018, Possession certificate No.31766206, Tax receipt No.743/2023, Location sketch No.554/2018, Complaint No.2931/2023
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sreekanth S Nair
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sandeep P Johnson
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Nafeesa P S
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Defendants are restrained by a permanent prohibitory injunction from trespassing and committing any waste or any damages in the plaint schedule property.
Evidence:
Defendants are restrained by a permanent prohibitory injunction from trespassing and committing any waste or any damages in the plaint schedule property.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Defendants are directed to pay costs of the suit to plaintiff.
Evidence:
Defendants are directed to pay costs of the suit to plaintiff.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Shows that the plaintiff purchased the plaint schedule property from Robert.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Possession Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Establishes the plaintiff's possession of the property.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Provides evidence of the plaintiff's financial responsibilities for the property.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Location Sketch
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Details the location and boundaries of the property in question.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Complaint
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document of a prior complaint made by the 1st defendant against the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A5

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Sreedevi vs Ambily Roshan et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Sreedevi vs Ambily Roshan et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Quick Facts

Location
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sat, 02/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 02/28/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won