| Niyamam AI

Displaying 2141 - 2145 of 15105

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Sam C. Uthup vs C.R Lopez regarding permanent prohibitory injunction and mandatory injunction

Injunction

O.S No. 102/2022

Ernakulam

2025-02-28

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Leela et al vs Krishnan et al regarding a civil suit

Civil Suit

O.S No. 180/2021

Ernakulam

2025-02-28

approximately-3 years 6 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between A2Z Sanitary Wares vs S A Salam regarding realization of money.

Civil Suit

O.S. No.6/2018

Ernakulam

2025-01-04

approximately-6 years 8 months

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Shri. John Tharakan vs Shri. P. Raju Tharakan et al regarding issuance of Succession Certificate

Succession

Succession O.P . No. 7/2023

Ernakulam

2025-01-08

approximately-7 years 6 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Vishnu Reddy vs Lissy regarding temporary injunction on property

Civil Suit

O.S No. 189/2024

Ernakulam

2025-01-10

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

39%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 15,022 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 4.2 years

Settlement Likelihood 14%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 574 cases)
Sale deed (in 480 cases)
Tax receipt (in 375 cases)
Land Tax Receipt (in 183 cases)
Death Certificate (in 182 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 5903
Defendant Won: 8099

8137

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

45%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Absence of Plaintiff

Plaintiff consistently failed to appear in court, leading to case dismissals.

Found in 45 cases (45%) High Impact

Failure to Produce Necessary Documents

Plaintiff did not provide essential documents required for proof, which resulted in case dismissal.

Found in 30 cases (30%) High Impact

Non-Payment of Required Costs

Plaintiff's failure to pay court-ordered costs led to numerous dismissals.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

Lack of Representation

Plaintiffs often failed to secure legal representation at hearings, resulting in case dismissals.

Found in 10 cases (10%) Low Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Absence of Plaintiff

Failure to Produce Necessary Documents

Non-Payment of Required Costs

Lack of Representation

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?