Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No.6/2018

Case between A2Z Sanitary Wares vs S A Salam regarding realization of money.

Court
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Judge
Smt. Needi. K. Dinamany
Order Date
2025-01-04
Duration
approximately-6 years 8 months
Case Closed
Sat, 01/04/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, A2Z Sanitary Wares, is seeking recovery of outstanding payments from the defendant, S A Salam, for sanitary wares supplied on credit. The defendant claims to have paid the amount to the plaintiff's employee, leading to a dispute over the payment.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the suit, concluding that the plaintiff failed to prove the claim for the outstanding amount. The defendant successfully demonstrated that the amount had already been paid.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit, concluding that the plaintiff failed to prove the claim for the outstanding amount. The defendant successfully demonstrated that the amount had already been paid.
Key Reasoning:
The defendant proved discharge of the claimed amount through evidence.
Why Defendant Won:
The defendant proved discharge of the claimed amount through evidence.
Supporting Evidence
The evidence of DW2 and Ext B2 receipt supported the defendant's claim of discharge, establishing the plaintiff's failure to prove their case.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, suit is dismissed with costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
A2Z Sanitary Wares
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mr. S A Salam
Party Age
55
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sri. S Thajudin
Party Age
68
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Invoice dated 25.05.2015, Invoice dated 27.05.2015, Invoice dated 03.06.2015, Invoice dated 10.06.2015, Invoice dated 01.07.2015, Invoice dated 03.07.2015, Lawyer notice dated 10.10.2017.
Defendants Documents
General power of attorney executed in favour of Mr. Yasar Thaj, Certified copy of complaint in CC No. 143/17.

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
T K Radhakrishnan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
K L Sreedevi
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Chithra R Shenoy
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
T R Harikrishnan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Benny Varghese
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
S Abdul Rasheed
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Refused
Description:
Plaintiff sought recovery of Rs. 43,426/- from the defendant.
Evidence:
Thus issue No. 1 is found against the plaintiff.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Tax Invoice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
To show transactions between the plaintiff and defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Tax Invoice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
To show transactions between the plaintiff and defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Tax Invoice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
To show transactions between the plaintiff and defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Tax Invoice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
To show transactions between the plaintiff and defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Tax Invoice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
To show transactions between the plaintiff and defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Tax Invoice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
To show transactions between the plaintiff and defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Statement of Account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Shows the outstanding amount due from defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
To demand repayment of the outstanding amount.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Receipt
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Acknowledges the payment of the outstanding amount.
Reference:
Ext.B2
Document Type: Complaint
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Evidence of criminal cases filed against defendent's agent for misappropriation.
Reference:
Ext.B3 to B9

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between A2Z Sanitary Wares vs S A Salam regarding realization of money.
Case Code Year
Case between A2Z Sanitary Wares vs S A Salam regarding realization of money.

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Mon, 01/01/2018 - 12:00
Case Closed
Sat, 01/04/2025 - 12:00
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 01/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won