| Niyamam AI

Displaying 1091 - 1095 of 15096

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Aslam et al vs Nasimudheen et al regarding temporary injunction

Civil Suit

OS No. 169/2025

2025-08-26

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Premalatha et al vs Priyanka et al regarding mediation settlement

Civil Suit

Original Suit No. 223/2023

Varkala, Thiruvananthapuram District

2025-08-26

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Muhammed Ibrahim vs Sharafudheen @ Pakki et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.

Civil Suit

OS NO. 88/2019

Varkala, Thiruvananthapuram District

2025-08-27

approximately-6 years 8 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Ullas et al vs Chandrika regarding Petition for Commission

Civil Suit

OS NO. 82/ 2023

Varkala

2025-01-04

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Alice Chacko vs Rolin Sunil et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 242 /2023

Ernakulam

2024-07-31

approximately-1 year 1 month

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

39%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 15,022 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 4.2 years

Settlement Likelihood 14%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 574 cases)
Sale deed (in 480 cases)
Tax receipt (in 375 cases)
Land Tax Receipt (in 183 cases)
Death Certificate (in 182 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 5903
Defendant Won: 8099

8130

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

30%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Absence of Plaintiff

Plaintiffs frequently failed to appear in court, leading to automatic case dismissals.

Found in 30 cases (30%) High Impact

Failure to Provide Necessary Evidence

Plaintiffs lacked sufficient evidence to support their claims, resulting in dismissal.

Found in 25 cases (25%) High Impact

Non-Payment of Court Costs

Dismissals occurred due to plaintiffs not paying required fees or costs mandated by the court.

Found in 20 cases (20%) Medium Impact

Lack of Document Production

Failure to produce necessary documents led to automatic dismissals in multiple cases.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Absence of Plaintiff

Failure to Provide Necessary Evidence

Non-Payment of Court Costs

Lack of Document Production

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?