Case Summary
The plaintiff, Alice Chacko, is suing for a permanent prohibitory injunction against Rolin Sunil and others concerning property rights. The case revolves around claims of harassment and property possession after the death of the plaintiff's husband.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court found in favor of the defendants and dismissed the suit. The plaintiff failed to prove her claims regarding possession of the disputed property.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff did not provide sufficient evidence to support her claims of possession and ownership.
The plaintiff did not provide sufficient evidence to support her claims of possession and ownership.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff did not provide sufficient evidence to support her claims of possession and ownership.
The plaintiff did not provide sufficient evidence to support her claims of possession and ownership.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff has not disputed the title of the plaint schedule property nor claimed that she has right of ownership over plaint schedule property.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, suit is dismissed with costs.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Alice Chacko
- Party Age
- 64
- Relation
- W/o (late) Y. Chacko
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Rolin Sunil
- Party Age
- 43
- Relation
- W/o (late) Sunil
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sandra Sunil
- Party Age
- 22
- Relation
- D/o (late) Sunil
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Saniya Sunil
- Party Age
- 15
- Relation
- (Minor)
Plaintiffs Documents
Copy of order of Maintenance Tribunal, Fort Kochi, Copy of Marriage Certificate plaintiff, Copy of death certificate of Y. Chacko, Copy of certified copy of the settlement deed No.3263/12 of Maradu SRO, Copy of lawyer notice issued to 1st defendant, Postal receipt.
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Babu Cherukara
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Kirosh Rajan Ponnambil
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Jasmin.T.K
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Manju Paul
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Permanent Injunction
Outcome:
Refused
Description:
The plaintiff requested a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants regarding the property.
Evidence:
Hence from the above discussion this court is satisfied that the plaintiff has not proved the case. Hence plaintiff is not entitled to the reliefs claimed for.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Copy of order of Maintenance Tribunal
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document demonstrates the plaintiff's claim for maintenance and the conditions under which the defendants must provide it.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type:
Copy of Marriage Certificate
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document establishes the plaintiff's marital status, supporting her claims.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type:
Copy of Death Certificate
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document confirms the death of Y. Chacko, which is central to the plaintiff's claims.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type:
Copy of certified copy of the settlement deed
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document evidences the formal transfer of property rights from Y. Chacko, which is crucial to the case.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type:
Copy of Lawyer Notice
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document indicates the plaintiff's communication with the defendants regarding her demands.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type:
Postal receipt
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document provides evidence of the notice sent by the plaintiff to the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Alice Chacko vs Rolin Sunil et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Alice Chacko vs Rolin Sunil et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction