| Niyamam AI

Displaying 926 - 930 of 15097

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Praveen CP vs Dhanaraj PV et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.

Civil Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT No.427/2024

Kozhikode

2025-12-04

approximately-1 year 5 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Ashraf vs Sikkanthar et al regarding arrears of rent.

Civil Suit

O.S.No.169/2022

Kozhikode

2025-12-04

approximately-3 years 6 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between P Shanmughan vs Sarath Chandran regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Civil Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT No.216/2021

Kozhikode District

2025-12-10

approximately-4 years 10 months

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Varsha P et al regarding realization of an amount due

Civil Suit

Original Suit No.451/2023

Kozhikode

2025-12-12

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between KG Sibil vs Shibin C regarding return of advance amount

Civil Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT No.30/2023

Kozhikode

2025-12-12

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

39%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 15,022 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 4.2 years

Settlement Likelihood 14%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 574 cases)
Sale deed (in 480 cases)
Tax receipt (in 375 cases)
Land Tax Receipt (in 183 cases)
Death Certificate (in 182 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 5903
Defendant Won: 8099

8133

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

43%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Absence

Plaintiffs frequently failed to appear in court, resulting in dismissals for default.

Found in 43 cases (43%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Inadequate or missing evidence led to dismissals as plaintiffs could not support their claims.

Found in 22 cases (22%) Medium Impact

Non-Payment of Costs

Many cases were dismissed due to plaintiffs not paying necessary court fees or costs.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

Failure to Produce Documents

Plaintiffs often failed to provide required documentation, compromising their cases significantly.

Found in 17 cases (17%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Absence

Lack of Evidence Presented

Non-Payment of Costs

Failure to Produce Documents

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?