Case Summary
The plaintiff, Praveen CP, seeks a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants who are members of the Landmark Metropolis Owners Association. The case concerns disputes over the governance and management of property in the Landmark Metropolis Apartments.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Permanent prohibitory injunction restraining the defendants from interfering with the plaintiff's car parking space.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, issuing a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants from interfering with the plaintiff's enjoyment of the car parking space.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The unchallenged evidence of the plaintiff showed that he is entitled to a decree as prayed for.
The unchallenged evidence of the plaintiff showed that he is entitled to a decree as prayed for.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The unchallenged evidence of the plaintiff showed that he is entitled to a decree as prayed for.
The unchallenged evidence of the plaintiff showed that he is entitled to a decree as prayed for.
Supporting Evidence
The unchallenged evidence of PW1 and Ext.A1 to A4 would show that the plaintiff is entitled to a decree as prayed for.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, the suit is decreed as follows. 1.The defendants No. 1 to 11 are restrained by a decree of permanent prohibitory injunction from interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of plaint schedule property so as to cause any inconvenience to the plaintiff's car parking space.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Praveen CP
- Party Age
- 64
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Dhanaraj PV
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Jayakumar R
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Renjin KR
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Firdos Ahmed Raju
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Jalaja PK
Plaintiffs Documents
Copy of lawyer notice issued by Adv.Santhoshkumar GS to the Land Mark Metropolis Owners Association, Notice under the Society Registration Act, 1860 issued by Praveen CP to the Land Mark Metropolis Owners Association, Notice under the Society Registration Act 1860 issued by Praveen CP, to District Registrar (General) office Mananchira, Photograph.
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri.Santhoshkumar GS
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Smt.Mubeena PT
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri.PC Suresh Kumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Smt.Rajani CK
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri.Shyju CT
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri.TK Mithran
- Appearance Type
- Government Pleader
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Permanent Injunction
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Defendants No. 1 to 11 are restrained from interfering with the plaintiff's car parking space.
Evidence:
The defendants No. 1 to 11 are restrained by a decree of permanent prohibitory injunction from interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of plaint schedule property so as to cause any inconvenience to the plaintiff's car parking space.
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Plaintiff entitled to costs of the suit from the defendants.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is also entitled to get the costs of the suit from the defendants.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Copy of Lawyer Notice
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Used to establish communication with the Land Mark Metropolis Owners Association.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type:
Notice under the Society Registration Act, 1860
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Issued to inform the Land Mark Metropolis Owners Association regarding legal obligations.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type:
Notice under the Society Registration Act, 1860
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Directed to the District Registrar (General) office for compliance with regulations.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type:
Photograph
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Presented as evidence supporting the plaintiff's claims.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 1 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Praveen CP vs Dhanaraj PV et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
Case Code Year
Case between Praveen CP vs Dhanaraj PV et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.