| Niyamam AI

Displaying 366 - 370 of 594

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Mathew vs Justy Toms regarding Punishable U/s 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.

Criminal Case

S.T No. 8 /2021

Pala

2025-03-28

approximately-2 years 4 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Finvent Finance and Investments Ltd vs Rejani R regarding offence under U/s.138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act

Criminal Case

S.T.17/2022

Kottayam District

2025-11-15

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Keerthi Hire Purchase and Credit Ltd vs Vishnu K Jayan regarding Acquittal under section 280.

Criminal Case

S.T.15/2021

Kottayam

2025-11-17

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between HDFC Bank Ltd vs Jobin Joyce regarding U/s.138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.

Criminal Case

S.T.137/2020

Kottayam

2025-11-19

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Keerthi Hire Purchase and Credits Ltd vs Remya C K regarding U/s.138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act

Criminal Case

S.T.35/2021

KOTTAYAM

2025-12-24

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

37%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 594 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength Medium Impact

Average Case Duration 3.6 years

Settlement Likelihood 10%

Common Winning Factors:

Cheque (in 220 cases)
Postal receipt (in 136 cases)
Acknowledgment card (in 87 cases)
Cheque Return Memo (in 83 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 67 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 222
Defendant Won: 342

342

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

54%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Withdrawal of Complaint by Complainant

The majority of acquittals resulted from the complainant's withdrawal of the complaint.

Found in 54 cases (54%) High Impact

Insufficient Evidence from Complainant

Plaintiffs frequently failed to provide necessary evidence to support their claims, leading to acquittals.

Found in 28 cases (28%) Medium Impact

Complainant's Absence in Court

Acquittals often occurred due to the complainant's failure to appear for court proceedings.

Found in 10 cases (10%) Medium Impact

Lack of Legally Enforceable Debt

Many cases were dismissed due to the failure to prove that a legally enforceable debt existed.

Found in 8 cases (8%) Low Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Withdrawal of Complaint by Complainant

Insufficient Evidence from Complainant

Complainant's Absence in Court

Lack of Legally Enforceable Debt

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?