Case Summary
Mathew, aged 66, filed a complaint against Justy Toms regarding an offense punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court noted that the accused is no more, leading to the charge being abated.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Criminal Case
Final Judgment
No
The charge against the accused stands abated due to the accused's demise.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Supporting Evidence
Not available
Judgment Evidence:
Hence, the charge against the accused stands abated.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Mathew
- Party Age
- 66
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Justy Toms
- Party Age
- 50
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Jaison Joseph
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Muhammed Sanju K.S
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Criminal Case
Category
Cheque Bounce Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Pala
Common Reasons
Cheque dishonour
Case Code
Case between Mathew vs Justy Toms regarding Punishable U/s 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
Case Code Year
Case between Mathew vs Justy Toms regarding Punishable U/s 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
Case Flags
Cheque-Related Case
Nature of Cheque Case
Cheque dishonour under Section 138 N.I. Act