| Niyamam AI

Displaying 1246 - 1250 of 2454

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between M/s Heera Life Style Apartment Owners Association vs Parth.S. Shah regarding realization of money

Civil Suit

O.S. No.715/2023

Ernakulam

2024-03-15

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Johnson Samuel vs Smt. Asha regarding recovery of money.

Civil Suit

O.S No. 131/2022

Ernakulam

2024-03-15

approximately-2 years 11 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between State Bank of India vs James Simon et al regarding realization of money

Civil Suit

O.S. No.914/2023

Ernakulam

2024-03-16

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Punjab National Bank vs M/s Vijaya Fashions Private Limited et al regarding realization of money.

Civil Suit

O.S. No.1054/2022

Ernakulam

2024-03-16

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between M/s. Canara Bank vs Smt. Mini Jayakumar, Smt. Asha Prabhath regarding realisation of money.

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 1187 of 2020

Ernakulam

2024-03-19

approximately-4 years 0 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

89%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 2,443 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.9 years

Settlement Likelihood 6%

Common Winning Factors:

Statement of Account (in 538 cases)
Loan Application (in 488 cases)
Postal receipt (in 435 cases)
Demand Promissory Note (in 354 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 290 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 2163
Defendant Won: 218

222

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

34%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs repeatedly failed to pay the necessary fee for proceeding with the case.

Found in 34 cases (34%) High Impact

Absence of Plaintiff

Cases were dismissed due to the plaintiffs' failure to appear or represent themselves in court.

Found in 25 cases (25%) Medium Impact

Lack of Evidence

Plaintiffs did not provide adequate evidence to support their claims or the means of the defendants.

Found in 24 cases (24%) Medium Impact

Failure to Press Claim

Plaintiffs neglected to actively pursue or press their claims in court, resulting in dismissals.

Found in 17 cases (17%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Batta

Absence of Plaintiff

Lack of Evidence

Failure to Press Claim

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?