Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 131/2022

Case between Johnson Samuel vs Smt. Asha regarding recovery of money.

Court
I Additional Munsiff, Ernakulam
Judge
Sri. Padmakumar.G.
Order Date
2024-03-15
Duration
approximately-2 years 11 days
Case Closed
Fri, 03/15/2024 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Johnson Samuel, is a businessman who lent money to the defendant, Smt. Asha, under a promissory note. The defendant defaulted on the repayment, leading the plaintiff to file a suit for recovery of the owed amount.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed that the defendant must pay the plaintiff Rs.3,92,000/- with interest. The plaintiff is also entitled to recover the amount from the defendant's assets if necessary.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Defendant is directed to pay Rs.3,92,000/- with 9% future interest.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed that the defendant must pay the plaintiff Rs.3,92,000/- with interest. The plaintiff is also entitled to recover the amount from the defendant's assets if necessary.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The unchallenged proof affidavit and documents satisfactorily proved the plaint claim.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The unchallenged proof affidavit and documents satisfactorily proved the plaint claim.
Supporting Evidence
The unchallenged proof affidavit and documents would satisfactorily prove the plaint claim. So, a decree can rightly be passed as prayed for.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed directing the defendant to pay an amount of Rs.3,92,000/- with 9% future interest per annum from the date of suit until the date of decree.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Johnson Samuel
Party Age
40
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Smt. Asha
Party Age
37
Relation
D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Original Demand Promissory note executed by defendant in favour of the plaintiff.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Varghese C Kuriakose
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Ranimol M.T
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Shibu Muraleedharan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Jaison Antony
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The suit is decreed directing the defendant to pay an amount of Rs.3,92,000/- with 9% future interest per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree.
Evidence:
In the result, 1. The suit is decreed directing the defendant to pay an amount of Rs.3,92,000/- (Rupees three lakhs ninety two thousand only) with 9% future interest per annum from the date of suit(ie, from 7.2.2022) till the date of decree.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to costs of the suit.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to costs of the suit.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Promissory Note
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original Demand Promissory note executed by defendant in favour of the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A1

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between Johnson Samuel vs Smt. Asha regarding recovery of money.
Case Code Year
Case between Johnson Samuel vs Smt. Asha regarding recovery of money.

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Wed, 03/02/2022 - 12:00
Case Closed
Fri, 03/15/2024 - 12:00
From
Fri, 03/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Sun, 03/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Canara Bank vs Mrs. Preethymol P.T regarding realization of money
Court of the Third Addl. Munsiff & Rent Controller, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Fr. Antony Chiriyankandath vs Sri. Mathew C.T. regarding realization of money
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Bank of Baroda represented by its Chief Manager, Manohar M vs Ratheesh P.S regarding recovery of money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Meera N B vs Vincy E J et al regarding realization of money
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s Transformers and Electrical Industries vs M/s Crystal Traders regarding realization of money
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won