Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 505/2023

Case between T.K.Shoukath Ali et al vs The Puthupallipuram SNDP Branch no. 219 et al regarding prohibitory injunction

Court
Munsiff Court
Judge
Sri. Nanda Krishna M.
Order Date
2025-11-28
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

T.K.Shoukath Ali and others filed a suit against The Puthupallipuram SNDP Branch no. 219 and others seeking relief from forceful eviction from their rented business premises. The plaintiffs claim they are being coerced into paying increased rent without proper authority.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court granted a permanent prohibitory injunction restraining the defendants from forcefully evicting the plaintiffs without due process of law. The court found that the plaintiffs had reason to fear illegal eviction.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Permanent prohibitory injunction against forceful eviction
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court granted a permanent prohibitory injunction restraining the defendants from forcefully evicting the plaintiffs without due process of law. The court found that the plaintiffs had reason to fear illegal eviction.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court determined that the plaintiffs were in settled possession and were entitled to protection against illegal eviction without due process.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The court found that dispossession cannot be executed by means of force and a permanent prohibitory injunction is necessary to protect the plaintiffs’ interests.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed in part i. The defendants and their agents are restrained from forcefully evicting the plaintiffs from the plaint A, B and C schedule shop rooms unless in accordance with due process of law.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
T.K.Shoukath Ali
Party Age
66
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Ashraf U.V
Party Age
39
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Abdul Sathar P.T
Party Age
51
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
The Puthupallipuram SNDP Branch no. 219
Relation
represented by its Secretary
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
SNDP Kanayannur taluk Union
Relation
represented by its General Secretary
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
SNDP Yogam
Relation
represented by its General Secretary
Plaintiffs Documents
True copy of the Account statement issued by the Indian Overseas Bank, Edappally; Computer extract of the Google Pay receipt of Rs. 5,495/-.
Defendants Documents
Certified copy of the Judgment in OS 1569/15 passed by the Hon'ble Principal Munsiff Court, Ernakulam

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sushanth J
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Prasanth V.C
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Prem Raj C.K
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Misna Saleem
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Rajesh Vijyendran
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Priyanka Gopi
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Aparna Shaji
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
A.N.Rajan Babu
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
A.R.Easwar Lal
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiffs are granted an injunction restraining the defendants from forcefully evicting them from the shop rooms.
Evidence:
Therefore, a decree of permanent prohibitory injunction restraining the defendants from forcefully evicting the plaintiffs from the plaint schedule property can be granted as sought for.
Relief Type: Declaration
Outcome: Refused
Description:
Plaintiffs sought a declaration regarding the validity of the managing committee of the first defendant.
Evidence:
In the said circumstance, the issue is found against the plaintiff.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Account Statement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Evidence of financial transactions related to rental payments.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Google Pay Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Receipt showing payment made by the plaintiffs towards rent.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Judgment Copy
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Evidence supporting the election process of the defendant's management committee.
Reference:
Ext.B1

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Forceful eviction
Case Code
Case between T.K.Shoukath Ali et al vs The Puthupallipuram SNDP Branch no. 219 et al regarding prohibitory injunction
Case Code Year
Case between T.K.Shoukath Ali et al vs The Puthupallipuram SNDP Branch no. 219 et al regarding prohibitory injunction

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sat, 11/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 11/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between M/s QUBEFIX vs Rasheeda Marikar et al regarding eviction and rent arrears
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Mr. N.K.Balagopalan et al vs Mr. Ahmed Rafeeq regarding eviction under the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act 1965
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between K.V. Thomas et al vs M/s ALTAIM et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between K H Ramlath Nazer vs Apex India Education and Charitable Trust et al regarding realization of money
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Josemon George vs Greater Cochin Development Authority regarding rent enhancement and injunction
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won