Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S 285/2019

Case between Soumya Mohan vs Pradeepkumar P.R. et al regarding execution application

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Judge
Smitha Susan Mathew
Order Date
2025-08-11
Duration
Case Code No.
285
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Soumya Mohan is the decree holder and plaintiff seeking execution against the judgment debtors, which include Pradeepkumar P.R. and others. The court has allowed the execution application.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The execution application has been allowed by the court.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Execution Application
Final Judgment
No
The execution application has been allowed by the court.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The proposed judgment debtor was allowed to be impleaded without objection.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The proposed judgment debtor was allowed to be impleaded without objection.
Supporting Evidence
No objection in impleading. Proposed Judgment debtor is impleaded as additional Judgment Debtor 5.

Judgment Evidence:

Execution Application is allowed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Soumya Mohan
Party Age
37
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Pradeepkumar P.R.
Party Age
49
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Prasad P.R.
Party Age
52
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Bindhumol P.R.
Party Age
47
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Narayani T.
Party Age
46
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sreeram
Party Age
35
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Bilu G.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Archana R. Pillai
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
D. Biju
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Execution Application is allowed.
Evidence:
Execution Application is allowed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Execution Application
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kanjirappally
Common Reasons
Case Code
O.S
Case Code Year
2019

Quick Facts

Location
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kanjirappally
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Tue, 07/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Thomas et al vs Dayana Abraham et al regarding temporary prohibitory injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Execution Application Plaintiff Won
Case between Muhammed Shammas C.A. vs Isha Umma et al regarding permission to break open the lock
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Execution Application Plaintiff Won
Case between P.K. Abdul Hameed vs Sayyed Abdul Khadar regarding amendment of execution petition
Court of the Munsiff, Kanjirappally
Execution Application Plaintiff Won
Case between Soumya Mohan vs Pradeepkumar P.R. et al regarding property execution proceedings.
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Execution Application Defendant Won
Case between Cicily Paul et al vs Mary P Antony et al regarding maintainability of EP
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Execution Application Defendant Won