Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
E.A. No. 9/2025 in E.P. No. 96/2021 in OS 611/2015

Case between Cicily Paul et al vs Mary P Antony et al regarding maintainability of EP

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Judge
Smt. Jyothi Babu R
Order Date
2025-04-09
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Cicily Paul and others are the petitioners in this case, while Mary P Antony and others are the counter petitioners. The court reviewed the maintainability of the execution petition.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court concluded that the petition to review the maintainability of the execution petition cannot be allowed due to prior orders and lack of proper action by the petitioners.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Execution Application
Final Judgment
No
The court concluded that the petition to review the maintainability of the execution petition cannot be allowed due to prior orders and lack of proper action by the petitioners.
Key Reasoning:
The execution petition was determined to be maintainable as per prior orders.
Why Defendant Won:
The execution petition was determined to be maintainable as per prior orders.
Supporting Evidence
There is already an order holding that EP is maintainable.

Judgment Evidence:

In the above circumstances, the petition cannot be allowed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Cicily Paul
Party Age
62
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Jincy Babu
Party Age
39
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Justin Paul
Party Age
35
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Jackson Paul
Party Age
30
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mary P Antony
Party Age
60
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Alice P Jose
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Lissamma Antony
Party Age
50
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Bobby John K A
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
K Karjet
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Execution Application
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Cicily Paul et al vs Mary P Antony et al regarding maintainability of EP
Case Code Year
Case between Cicily Paul et al vs Mary P Antony et al regarding maintainability of EP

Quick Facts

Location
Kottayam District
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Tue, 04/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sat, 05/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
70%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Soumya Mohan vs Pradeepkumar P.R. et al regarding execution application
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Execution Application Plaintiff Won
Case between Muhammed Shammas C.A. vs Isha Umma et al regarding permission to break open the lock
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Execution Application Plaintiff Won
Case between P.K. Abdul Hameed vs Sayyed Abdul Khadar regarding amendment of execution petition
Court of the Munsiff, Kanjirappally
Execution Application Plaintiff Won
Case between Soumya Mohan vs Pradeepkumar P.R. et al regarding property execution proceedings.
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Execution Application Defendant Won
Case between Sajimon.K.A. et al vs P.M.John regarding Execution Application
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Execution Application Defendant Won