Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No 173/2023

Case between Sakker Hussian vs Kasim Kunju et al regarding review of order

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Judge
Smt.Ragi.S.
Order Date
2025-06-30
Duration
approximately-5 months
Case Code No.
173
Case Closed
Mon, 06/30/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Sakker Hussian filed a petition to review the order dated 27-01-2025 and to restore the suit on file. The respondents were served with notice but remained absent.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the petition for review and granted the petitioner an opportunity to proceed with the case.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the petition for review and granted the petitioner an opportunity to proceed with the case.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found sufficient reason to grant one more opportunity to the petitioner/plaintiff.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court found sufficient reason to grant one more opportunity to the petitioner/plaintiff.
Supporting Evidence
For the reasons stated in the petition I am of the view that one more opportunity is to be granted to the petitioner/plaintiff to proceed with the case and there is sufficient reason to review the order.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence petition allowed. No costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sakker Hussian
Party Age
57
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Kasim Kunju
Party Age
82
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Nazarudeen
Party Age
60
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Nahas Nazar
Party Age
39
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
V.Vinayachandran
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
to review the order dated 27/01/2025 and to restore the suit on file
Evidence:
I am of the view that one more opportunity is to be granted to the petitioner/plaintiff to proceed with the case and there is sufficient reason to review the order.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO
Case Code Year
2023

Quick Facts

Location
Kollam
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Case Filed
Fri, 01/27/2023 - 12:00
Case Closed
Mon, 06/30/2025 - 12:00
From
Thu, 05/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 06/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Raji.R.Nair vs M/s.Sathyan Finance et al regarding review of order
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Ajithkumar vs Shefeek regarding review of order
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Khulsam Beevi vs Kamarudeen et al regarding review of suit withdrawal.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Manu.G. et al regarding petition to set aside order
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Bank of Baroda vs M/s.Charms Beauty Parlour et al regarding setting aside the order dated 29-03-2025.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won