Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No 1085/2023

Case between Khulsam Beevi vs Kamarudeen et al regarding review of suit withdrawal.

Court
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Judge
Smt.Ragi.S.
Order Date
2025-06-25
Duration
approximately-5 months
Case Code No.
1085
Case Closed
Wed, 06/25/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

This case involves the plaintiff, Khulsam Beevi, who is seeking to review a previous order regarding her withdrawal of a suit. The defendants, including Kamarudeen, are alleged to have forced the plaintiff's thumb impression for withdrawal without her consent.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the review petition as the plaintiff had voluntarily withdrawn the case and failed to substantiate new allegations.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the review petition as the plaintiff had voluntarily withdrawn the case and failed to substantiate new allegations.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff's applications to withdraw the suit and change Advocate were allowed, leading to the case being dismissed.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff's applications to withdraw the suit and change Advocate were allowed, leading to the case being dismissed.
Supporting Evidence
The court found that the plaintiff had voluntarily filed applications to withdraw the suit and to charge their Advocate, both of which were allowed.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, petition dismissed. No costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Khulsam Beevi
Party Age
75
Relation
D/o Late Fathima Beevi
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Kamarudeen
Party Age
55
Relation
S/o Late Shahul Hameed
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Shanifa
Party Age
45
Relation
W/o Kamarudeen
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Nujumudeen
Party Age
58
Relation
S/o Late Shahul Hameed
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ramees
Party Age
48
Relation
W/o Nujumudeen
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
M. Muhammed Humayoon
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Chandrasekharan Pillai
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Refused
Description:
Review petition regarding the withdrawal of the suit and appointment of a new advocate.
Evidence:
the orders in IA 5/2024 and IA 6/2024 could not be reviewed. Therefore, the review petition was held to be not maintainable and is liable to be dismissed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO
Case Code Year
2023

Quick Facts

Location
Kollam
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Case Filed
Sun, 01/15/2023 - 12:00
Case Closed
Wed, 06/25/2025 - 12:00
From
Thu, 05/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 06/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Raji.R.Nair vs M/s.Sathyan Finance et al regarding review of order
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Ajithkumar vs Shefeek regarding review of order
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Manu.G. et al regarding petition to set aside order
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Bank of Baroda vs M/s.Charms Beauty Parlour et al regarding setting aside the order dated 29-03-2025.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sakker Hussian vs Kasim Kunju et al regarding review of order
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won