Case Summary
Raji, the petitioner/decree holder, filed an execution application to restore the execution petition which was dismissed for default. The respondent entered appearance but did not file any objection.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Execution Application
Final Judgment
No
The execution application was allowed as the court granted one more opportunity to the petitioner/decree holder since the respondent did not file any objection.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
I am of the view that one more opportunity is to be granted to the petitioner/Decree holder.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence Execution application allowed. Since the respondent/Judgment debtor not filed any objection, no costs ordered.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Raji
- Party Age
- 40
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Ravikumar
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Balan
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Biju
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Binu @ Unni
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Biji
- Relation
- D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Prince Kumar.G.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Execution application allowed to restore the EP 17/20 on file which was dismissed for default.
Evidence:
Hence Execution application allowed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Execution Application
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2010