Similar Cases
Based on: OS.No. 728/2010 — Case between Raji vs Ravikumar et al regarding Execution Application
48 matching cases found, ranked by shared legal context
OS.No. 530/2001
Case between Patric Martin et al vs Daniel Joseph et al regarding execution application
The petitioners, Patric Martin and Maria Dana Dhanavathy, are seeking the appointment of a survey commissioner to assess their property due to ongoing execution proceedings led by the decree holder, Daniel Joseph. The judgment debtors have faced multiple execution applications concerning their land over the past years.
Execution Application
Defendant Won
EA. No. 145/2024
Case between Sudhirbhai Mahipatvan Goswami vs Nagiam regarding Execution Application
Sudhirbhai Mahipatvan Goswami filed an Execution Application against Nagiam. The application is concerning the execution of a prior order.
Execution Application
Plaintiff Won
OS. No.1257/2014
Case between Surendranachari vs Ratheesh.R.Nair regarding Execution Application
Surendranachari, the plaintiff, is pursuing an execution application against Ratheesh.R.Nair, the defendant. The application was dismissed as not pressed.
Execution Application
Defendant Won
EA. No. 21/2025
Case between Salavudeen vs Payas George @ Rajan, Villies Payas regarding execution of decree.
Salavudeen is the decree holder seeking execution against judgment debtors Payas George and Villies Payas. The court found no objections to the execution application and closed the case.
Execution Application
Plaintiff Won
OS. 465/2006
Case between A.Noushad et al vs Nissar Navab et al regarding EA.131/2018
The petitioners include A.Noushad and his family members, who filed an execution application against Nissar Navab and others. The court has dismissed the application as not pressed.
Execution Application
Defendant Won
EA. 113/2025
Case between UCO Bank vs Aneesha.A.S et al regarding Execution Application
The case involves UCO Bank as the petitioner seeking to restore an execution petition that was dismissed for default. The respondents, Aneesha.A.S and others, did not participate in the proceedings.
Execution Application
Plaintiff Won
EA. No. 276/2024 in EP. 98/2022 in OS. 291/2011
Case between Prasanna Kumari vs M/s.Business Benefit Company Ltd. regarding Execution Application
The case involves Prasanna Kumari as the Petitioner/Decree Holder seeking to restore the Execution Petition against M/s.Business Benefit Company Ltd., the Respondent/Judgment Debtor. The court dismissed the Execution Application for default due to no fresh steps taken by the petitioner.
Execution Application
Defendant Won
EA. No. 78/2025in EP 3/2025 in OS. 800/2016
Case between Souja Beevi @ Safiya Beevi vs Nisa regarding revival of execution petition
The case involves Souja Beevi @ Safiya Beevi as the petitioner/decree holder and Nisa as the respondent/judgment debtor. The petitioner filed for the revival of an execution petition claiming obstruction in the construction of a boundary wall.
Execution Application
Defendant Won
EA. No. 59/2015 in EP. 334/2010
Case between Shahudeen Koya et al vs Dhanalekshmi et al regarding matter settled between the parties.
This case involves a petition filed by the decree holder under the Code of Civil Procedure. The parties have reached a settlement and the petition was dismissed as not pressed.
Execution Application
Defendant Won
OS.No. 1184/2008
Case between Jalaja et al vs Jayanthi et al regarding Execution application
This case involves Jalaja and others as petitioners who are decree holders against Jayanthi and others, the judgment debtors. The court allowed the execution application and directed the appointment of an advocate commissioner.
Execution Application
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.1221/2019
Case between Kesavankutty Nair. J vs Leena Mohanan et al regarding Execution Application
The petitioner, Kesavankutty Nair. J, seeks a stay on an order related to an execution application. The defendants are Leena Mohanan and Mohanan, who are the decree holders in this matter.
Execution Application
Defendant Won
OS.No.1709/1991
Case between Suresh.R.K et al vs Sethukutty Amma et al regarding Execution Application
The case involves Suresh.R.K and Radhakrishnan Nair as petitioners/judgment debtors, and Sethukutty Amma, T.R.Rajeev Kumar, and others as decree holders/judgment debtors. The dispute arises from an execution application regarding a mediation settlement that has not been fully complied with.
Execution Application
OS.No.342/2015
Case between Krishnan Kutty Nair vs Vincent.G regarding execution application for property demarcation.
Krishnan Kutty Nair filed an execution application seeking to ascertain and demarcate a property. Vincent.G is the counter petitioner with no objections filed.
Execution Application
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.524/1978
Case between M.Divakaran et al vs Gouri Parvathy et al regarding Execution application
The case involves M.Divakaran and his family as petitioners against Gouri Parvathy and other judgment debtors regarding an execution application. The court dismissed the execution application for default due to the absence of the petitioners.
Execution Application
Defendant Won
OS.No.930/2016
Case between Sajeev vs T.Unnikrishna Pillai regarding setting aside an exparte decree.
The case involves T.Unnikrishna Pillai as the defendant and Sajeev as the plaintiff. The defendant filed applications to set aside an exparte decree issued for the realization of money.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.502/2020
Case between Piyoos vs Sheemol regarding setting aside the order in RP.No.259/2024
Piyoos, aged 44 years, has filed this petition to set aside an earlier order and restore the RP on file. The respondent, Sheemol, aged 50 years, is involved in this matter.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.777/2016
Case between Parukutti Amma et al vs Abdul Rahim regarding restoration of suit.
The case involves a petition filed by Rema, the second plaintiff, to restore a suit originally filed by her deceased mother, Parukutti Amma. The respondent, Abdul Rahim, did not appear in court despite being served notice.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No. 785/2013
Case between Babu Chandhar et al vs Sarada Chandhatty et al regarding Partition.
Babu Chandhar, represented by his wife and attorney Syamala, filed a petition for a final decree for partition involving his mother and siblings. The case pertains to the division of property as per a preliminary decree originally issued in 2018.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.536/2015
Case between Satheesh et al vs Ajayan regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiffs, Satheesh and Sudhila, filed a suit for permanent prohibitory injunction. The suit was dismissed for default due to the plaintiffs' absence on a scheduled hearing date.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No. 459/2022
Case between Sudhakaran vs Thiruvithamcore Devaswam Board et al regarding restoration of IA. 266/24
The petitioner, Sudhakaran, filed an application to restore IA. 266/24 on file to set aside an ex-parte decree in the original suit. The court found that no objections were filed by the respondents and granted the request for restoration.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No. 557/2022
Case between Giriraj Kabra vs Harikrishnan Sasidharan regarding review of order
This case involves Giriraj Kabra petitioning to review a previous order regarding his suit. The respondent, Harikrishnan Sasidharan, was absent during the proceedings.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No. 375/2018
Case between Branch Manager, Canara Bank vs Stanly John et al regarding restoration of EP.
The case involves a petition for restoration of a money realization EP that was dismissed for default. The decree holder is Canara Bank and the judgment debtors are Stanly John and John Christopher.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No. 575/2023
Case between M.Satheesan vs Premarajan et al regarding restoration of suit.
M.Satheesan, aged 64, filed a petition to restore a suit. The court dismissed the petition due to the absence of fresh steps taken by the respondents.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No. 897/2023
Case between Manoj vs Suresh Kumar regarding Injunction
The plaintiffs, Manoj and Chinnu Venugopal, are seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction to prevent the defendants, Suresh Kumar and Jayasree, from trespassing on their property and creating a pathway through it. The case revolves around property ownership and the peaceful possession of the plaintiffs.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.299/2019
Case between Vijayan Pillai vs Vikraman Pillai regarding setting aside an exparte decree
Vikraman Pillai, the defendant, seeks to set aside an exparte decree issued against him in favor of his brother Vijayan Pillai, the plaintiff, concerning a disputed promissory note. The defendant claims he was unable to contest the decree due to health issues.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.665/2019
Case between Shylesh vs Sabu Surendran regarding restoration of suit
Shylesh, the Managing Partner of Evergreen Financiers, filed a petition to restore the suit on file. The respondent, Sabu Surendran, was absent during the proceedings.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No. 743/2019
Case between Salman Faris vs The South Indian Bank Ltd et al regarding setting aside an exparte decree.
The case involves Salman Faris as the petitioner challenging an exparte decree against him. The respondents include The South Indian Bank Ltd and two family members of the petitioner.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No. 385/2016
Case between Sarasikutty vs Ramachandran Pillai regarding setting aside an order.
Sarasikutty, the petitioner and original plaintiff, seeks to set aside a previous order and restore the original suit. The respondent is Ramachandran Pillai, the original defendant.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No. 905/2017
Case between Sebastian et al vs Joy @ Ajeeriyos et al regarding restoration of suit
The case involves petitioners Sebastian and Renju who filed a petition to set aside an order and restore their suit. The respondents are Joy and Shijil.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.710/2018
Case between Branch Manager, Canara Bank, Kundara vs Sujitha et al regarding restoration of suit
The Branch Manager of Canara Bank filed petitions to restore a suit that was previously rejected due to non-payment of court fees and to condone a delay in filing the review petition. The respondents did not appear before the court.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No. 292/2019
Case between Joseph.S et al vs Manohar Yesudas et al regarding Injunction.
This suit involves plaintiffs Joseph.S and Soosy seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against defendants Manohar Yesudas and Mercy, alleging that the defendants have been dumping waste on their property and attempting to trespass. The plaintiffs hold ownership of the properties in question and are seeking to prevent further actions by the defendants.
Injunction
Defendant Won
OS.No. 800/2016
Case between Souja Beevi @ Safia Beevi vs Nisa regarding execution petition.
Souja Beevi @ Safia Beevi is the decree holder who filed an execution petition against Nisa, the judgment debtor. The court has found that the decree is satisfied and has closed the execution petition.
Execution Petition
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.1095/2013
Case between Sindhu. V. vs Mohanan.T. regarding Execution Petition.
Sindhu. V. is the decree holder, and Mohanan.T. is the judgment debtor. The decree holder filed an execution petition which was dismissed due to her absence in court.
Execution Petition
Defendant Won
OS.No.122/2021
Case between Mohanan vs Lekha regarding realization of money.
The case involves the petitioner/defendant Mohanan and respondent/plaintiff Lekha regarding a money decree. The defendant contends that he was unaware of the suit leading to an exparte decree against him.
Common Order
Defendant Won
OS.No. 133/2024
Case between Sasikumar vs Rajamani regarding restoration of suit.
Sasikumar filed a petition to restore the suit on file. The court found the petitioner absent with no representation and dismissed the petition.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No. 1064/2016
Case between Minikumari et al vs Vishal et al regarding Injunction
This case involves Minikumari and her son Akashravi against Vishal and Vivek regarding the obstruction of a pathway. The plaintiffs seek a permanent injunction to prevent the defendants from trespassing and closing down the pathway that serves as access to their property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No. 290/2011
Case between Mohanachandran Nair vs Business Benefit Company Ltd regarding Execution Petition
The case involves a decree holder, Mohanachandran Nair, and a judgment debtor, Business Benefit Company Ltd. The execution petition was dismissed for default as the decree holder did not take any fresh steps.
Execution Petition
Defendant Won
OS.No.824/2013
Case between Valsala et al vs Beenakumari et al regarding setting aside exparte decree
This case involves a petition filed by Valsala and Vasantha to set aside an exparte decree regarding a civil suit. It came up for hearing in front of Principal Munsiff Ragi S.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.481/2024
Case between Branch Manager, Canara Bank vs Anaswara et al regarding restoration of suit
The Branch Manager of Canara Bank filed a review petition to restore a suit that was previously dismissed. The respondents did not appear in court or file any objections.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No. 393/2022
Case between Branch Manager, Canara Bank vs Janasree Sangham et al regarding restoration of suit
The petitioner, Branch Manager of Canara Bank, filed a petition to restore a suit that had been previously dismissed. The court observed that no steps were taken by the petitioner, leading to the dismissal of the petition.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No. 1005/2023
Case between Jaya Chandran.S vs Najeema.Y regarding restoration of suit
Jaya Chandran.S filed a petition to restore the suit, but both parties were absent during the hearing. The petition was dismissed for default due to lack of representation.
Civil Suit
Dismissed
OS.No. 560/2019
Case between P.G.Aravindakshan Nair vs Thahasildar et al regarding setting aside of an order.
P.G.Aravindakshan Nair filed a petition to set aside the order dated 20-03-2025, which dismissed his suit on merit. The court determined the petition to be not maintainable and dismissed it.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.629/2022
Case between Canara Bank vs St.Jude Missionary Institution et al regarding setting aside an exparte decree
The case involves Canara Bank as the plaintiff and St.Jude Missionary Institution and Yesudasan as defendants. The defendants filed a petition to set aside an exparte decree dated 17/10/2023, citing illness as the reason for their absence.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.747/2019
Case between Rev.Fr.Thomas Panicker vs Arun Chandukandi @ Arun C.K regarding setting aside an exparte decree.
The case involves Rev.Fr.Thomas Panicker as the plaintiff and Arun Chandukandi @ Arun C.K as the defendant. The defendant filed a petition to set aside an exparte decree passed against him.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No. 773/2016
Case between Aneesh Mohan et al vs Mini et al regarding Final Decree for Partition
The case involves a petition filed by Aneesh Mohan and Anumohan against Mini and Arunmohan for a final decree for partition. The matter was settled between the parties following a mediation agreement.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No. 223/2014
Case between Anas.N et al vs Sujatha et al regarding Declaration and Injunction
The plaintiffs, led by Anas.N, sought a declaration and injunction against the defendants, including Sujatha. The case was dismissed as not pressed after the plaintiffs' counsel indicated no further pursuit of the suit.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No. 112/2021
Case between Pious George et al vs Salavudeen et al regarding Injunction
This case involves the plaintiffs Pious George and Willis Pious filing for an injunction against the defendants Salavudeen and Ayoob. The plaintiff was absent during the hearings, leading to a dismissal of the suit.
Injunction
Defendant Won
OS.No. 120/2021
Case between Mohanlal et al vs Sheena et al regarding Fixation of Boundary and Injunction.
The case involves plaintiffs Mohanlal, Yamunabhai, Gangabhai, and Sindhubai filing a suit for the fixation of boundary and injunction against defendants Sheena, Varun, and Kiran. The plaintiffs were absent during the hearing, which led to the dismissal of the suit for non-prosecution.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won