Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 174/ 2021

Case between Nithin Saseendran vs Design Alchemy Architects et al regarding realization of money

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Judge
Sri. ARAVIND P.
Order Date
2025-01-25
Duration
approximately-5 years 7 months
Case Closed
Sat, 01/25/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Nithin Saseendran, is seeking repayment of an amount due from Design Alchemy Architects and its directors. The case centers around an agreement for construction work that was not completed as per the terms agreed upon.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed that the plaintiff is entitled to recover Rs. 9,29,231/- along with interest from the defendants. The defendants were also ordered to pay the costs of the proceedings.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Plaintiff is entitled to realize Rs. 9,29,231/- with 6% interest from the date of suit till the date of realization
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed that the plaintiff is entitled to recover Rs. 9,29,231/- along with interest from the defendants. The defendants were also ordered to pay the costs of the proceedings.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff established his case through unchallenged oral and documentary evidence.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff established his case through unchallenged oral and documentary evidence.
Supporting Evidence
Through the unchallenged oral and documentary evidence, the plaintiff has established his case. So the plaintiff is entitled to get a decree of realization of Rs. 9,29,231/- with interest from the defendants.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, suit is decreed as follows: The plaintiff is entitled to realize Rs. 9,29,231/- (Rupees Nine Lakhs Twenty Nine Thousand Two Hundred and Thirty One only) with 6% interest from the date of suit till the date of realization.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Nithin Saseendran
Party Age
38
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Design Alchemy Architects
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sathyan
Party Age
55
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Siyar Sathyan K.S.
Party Age
32
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Agreement dated 22-06-2019, Building Inspection Report
Defendants Documents
Photocopy of Invoice

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Prasanth S.S. Kattakkada
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is entitled to realize `9,29,231/- with interest.
Evidence:
So the plaintiff is entitled to get a decree of realization of `9,29,231/- (Rupees Nine Lakhs Twenty Nine Thousand Two Hundred and Thirty One only) with interest from the defendants.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is also entitled to realize costs of the proceedings from the defendants.
Evidence:
After considering the materials, this court is of the view that the defendants can be directed to pay costs of the proceedings to the plaintiff.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is the agreement between the plaintiff and the defendants for the construction of a residential building.
Reference:
Ext.A11
Document Type: Postal Receipts
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
These receipts were submitted as evidence of the plaintiff's communications with the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A9 (series)
Document Type: Certified copy of Sale Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This is a certified copy of the sale deed relevant to the property in question.
Reference:
Ext.A10
Document Type: Construction Estimate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document provides the estimated costs related to the construction.
Reference:
Ext.A14
Document Type: Building Inspection Report
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This report was issued following an inspection of the construction work.
Reference:
Ext.A16
Document Type: Oral Evidence
Submitted By: Unknown
Relevance:
The power of attorney holder of the plaintiff was examined as PW1.
Reference:

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between Nithin Saseendran vs Design Alchemy Architects et al regarding realization of money
Case Code Year
Case between Nithin Saseendran vs Design Alchemy Architects et al regarding realization of money

Quick Facts

Location
Varkala, Kerala
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Case Filed
Sat, 06/22/2019 - 12:00
Case Closed
Sat, 01/25/2025 - 12:00
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 04/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between The Federal Bank Ltd. vs Nazar regarding loan recovery
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between The Federal Bank Ltd. vs Akhila Anil et al regarding loan recovery
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Nazar et al regarding realization of money.
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Anilkumar vs Subin Babu et al regarding realization of money based on a dishonored cheque
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between M/s. Mulamoottil Consumer Credits LTD. vs Santha et al regarding realisation of money.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won