Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
Original Suit No. 397/2018

Case between Anilkumar vs Subin Babu et al regarding realization of money based on a dishonored cheque

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Judge
Sri. ARAVIND P.
Order Date
2025-01-28
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Anilkumar has filed a suit against the legal heirs of deceased Mr. Babu, seeking to recover Rs. 53,500 with interest based on a dishonored cheque. The defendants, claiming they are not liable, argue that no financial transaction occurred between Anilkumar and the deceased.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit filed by Anilkumar has been dismissed as the court found that the plaintiff failed to establish the existence of the alleged debt and that late Mr. Babu never executed the cheque in question.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit filed by Anilkumar has been dismissed as the court found that the plaintiff failed to establish the existence of the alleged debt and that late Mr. Babu never executed the cheque in question.
Key Reasoning:
The defendants successfully proved that late Mr. Babu did not execute the cheque and that no financial transaction occurred between him and the plaintiff.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Through the oral and documentary evidence, the defendants established that late Mr. Babu hasn't executed and issued Ext.A1 cheque.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, suit is dismissed. No order as to costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Anilkumar
Party Age
64
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Subin Babu
Party Age
35
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sabin Babu
Party Age
32
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sunantha Babu
Party Age
62
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Cheques, Advocate Notices, Intimation memo regarding returned cheque, Sale deed.
Defendants Documents
Documents providing information about the merging of banks, Certificate from Union Bank.

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. M. Chandran
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. D. Anilkumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. S.V. Shinu
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Refused
Description:
The plaintiff claimed recovery of `53,500/- with interest.
Evidence:
In the result, suit is dismissed.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Cheque
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This cheque was claimed to be issued by late Mr. Babu for the borrowed amount.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Advocate Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This is an office copy of the advocate notice addressed to the first defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Advocate Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This is an office copy of the advocate notice addressed to the second defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Advocate Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This is an office copy of the advocate notice addressed to the third defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This postal receipt acknowledges the notice sent to the first defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This postal receipt acknowledges the notice sent to the second defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This postal receipt acknowledges the notice sent to the third defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Acknowledgment card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This card confirms the receipt of notice by the first defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Acknowledgment card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This card confirms the receipt of notice by the second defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A9
Document Type: Acknowledgment card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This card confirms the receipt of notice by the third defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A10
Document Type: Intimation Memo
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This memo relates to the return of the cheque from Catholic Syrian Bank.
Reference:
Ext.A11
Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This is a certified copy of the sale deed related to the plaint schedule property.
Reference:
Ext.A12
Document Type: Documents
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
These documents provide information about the merging of Corporation Bank into Union Bank.
Reference:
Ext.B1
Document Type: Certificate
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
This certificate was issued by Varkala Branch of Union Bank.
Reference:
Ext.B2

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between Anilkumar vs Subin Babu et al regarding realization of money based on a dishonored cheque
Case Code Year
Case between Anilkumar vs Subin Babu et al regarding realization of money based on a dishonored cheque

Case Flags

Cheque-Related Case
Nature of Cheque Case
Cheque Dishonour

Quick Facts

Location
Varkala Taluk, Thiruvananthapuram District
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 04/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between The Federal Bank Ltd. vs Nazar regarding loan recovery
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between The Federal Bank Ltd. vs Akhila Anil et al regarding loan recovery
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Nazar et al regarding realization of money.
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Nithin Saseendran vs Design Alchemy Architects et al regarding realization of money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s. Mulamoottil Consumer Credits LTD. vs Santha et al regarding realisation of money.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won