Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 1077/2022

Case between Mary Salomy K.A. vs M/s. Kasal India Pvt. Ltd. et al regarding realization of money.

Court
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Reeja R. Nair
Order Date
2025-09-22
Duration
approximately-3 years 2 months 12 days
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Mary Salomy K.A., is seeking payment of outstanding rent from the defendants, M/s. Kasal India Pvt. Ltd. and K. Balachandran Nair, for a property leased to them. The defendants failed to pay rent that accumulated to Rs. 4,89,029/- despite vacating the premises.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendants to pay an amount of Rs. 4,89,029/- along with interest and costs. The defendants failed to present any evidence against the claims made by the plaintiff.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of Rs. 4,89,029/- with interest and costs from the defendants.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendants to pay an amount of Rs. 4,89,029/- along with interest and costs. The defendants failed to present any evidence against the claims made by the plaintiff.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff's claims were uncontroverted, supported by her testimony and documentary evidence.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff's claims were uncontroverted, supported by her testimony and documentary evidence.
Supporting Evidence
The unrebutted oral testimony of PW1 and Exts. A1 to A3, established the case as pleaded by the plaintiff. It reflects that the plaint claim remains unpaid till date.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, suit is decreed as follows; 1.The plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of Rs.4,89,029/- (Rupees Four Lakh Eighty Nine Thousand and Twenty Nine only) from the defendants and from their assets.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Mary Salomy K.A.
Party Age
65
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
M/s. Kasal India Pvt. Ltd.
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
K. Balachandran Nair
Relation
The Managing Director
Plaintiffs Documents
Original Lease Agreement dated 10.07.2017, Copy of Lawyer's notice dated 11.08.2022, Original returned postal envelope along with A/D.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Paul K. Varghese
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Jalaluddeen Mohammad K.P.S.
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to recover Rs.4,89,029/- from the defendants.
Evidence:
In the result, suit is decreed as follows; 1.The plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of Rs.4,89,029/- (Rupees Four Lakh Eighty Nine Thousand and Twenty Nine only) from the defendants and from their assets.
Relief Type: Damages
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to interest @ 12% per annum from the date of the suit till date of decree.
Evidence:
2.The plaintiff is entitled to realize interest @ 12% per annum for Rs.4,89,029/- (Rupees Four Lakh Eighty Nine Thousand and Twenty Nine only) from the date of suit till date decree from the defendants and from their assets.
Relief Type: Damages
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to interest @ 6% per annum from the date of decree till date of realization.
Evidence:
3.The plaintiff is entitled to realize interest @ 6% per annum for Rs.4,89,029/- (Rupees Four Lakh Eighty Nine Thousand and Twenty Nine only) from date of decree till date of realization from the defendants and from their assets.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to realize costs of the suit from the defendants.
Evidence:
4.The plaintiff is entitled to realize costs of the suit from defendants and from their assets.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Original lease agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document establishes the terms of the lease and the amount of rent due.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Copy of Lawyer’s notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This notice was a formal demand for the outstanding rent owed by the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Original returned postal envelope along with acknowledgment card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document serves as proof that the lawyer's notice sent to the defendants was returned as unclaimed.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Oral Evidence
Submitted By: Unknown
Relevance:
Oral testimony of the plaintiff supported the claims made in the suit.
Reference:

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between Mary Salomy K.A. vs M/s. Kasal India Pvt. Ltd. et al regarding realization of money.
Case Code Year
Case between Mary Salomy K.A. vs M/s. Kasal India Pvt. Ltd. et al regarding realization of money.

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Sun, 07/10/2022 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Mon, 09/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Tue, 09/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Maker Village vs M/s. V Robotics Innovations Private Limited et al regarding realization of money.
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Bajaj Electricals Limited vs Viswas Marketting Agencies regarding realization of money
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Southern Phosphate & Mineral vs Mahavishnu Agro Service regarding realization of money
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between PREFire Solutions vs Ernakulam Tourist Bungalow et al regarding realization of money
Court of Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s M D George and Company vs M/s Zillion Infrastructure (P) Ltd. regarding realization of money and mandatory injunction.
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won