Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 1270/2024

Case between Southern Phosphate & Mineral vs Mahavishnu Agro Service regarding realization of money

Court
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Judge
Needi.K.Dinamany
Order Date
2025-10-13
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Southern Phosphate & Mineral, a partnership firm, has filed a suit against Mahavishnu Agro Service and its proprietor Mahesh due to unpaid debts totaling Rs.6,71,591/-. The defendants have failed to clear the outstanding dues despite repeated demands.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The suit is decreed in favor of the plaintiff. The defendants are ordered to pay Rs.7,28,777/- along with interest.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Defendants are directed to pay Rs.7,28,777/- along with interest.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit is decreed in favor of the plaintiff. The defendants are ordered to pay Rs.7,28,777/- along with interest.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Plaintiff established a case through evidence and the defendants' admission of liability.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Plaintiff established a case through evidence and the defendants' admission of liability.
Supporting Evidence
On perusal of the plaint, proof affidavit and documents produced, I am of the view that plaintiff has established a case and plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of Rs.7,28,777/- with interest from defendants.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, suit is decreed as follows: 1) Defendants shall pay Rs.7,28,777/- along with interest @12% from the date of suit till the date of decree and 6% from the date of decree till payment or realization, as the case may be, to the plaintiff.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Southern Phosphate & Mineral
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mahavishnu Agro Service
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mahesh
Party Age
57
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Original of the letter of authorization dated 15.10.2024, Original of tax invoice No.SPMKL0449/21-22 dated 09.06.2021, Original of tax invoice No.SPMKL0662/21-22 dated 06.07.2021, Original of tax invoice No.SPMKL3996/21-22 dated 13.08.2021, Office copy of lawyer notice dated 12.02.2024
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
K S Babu
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Babu Shankar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Menino Futo
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Antija James
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Arun Sankar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Akshaya Thomas
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is entitled to recover Rs.7,28,777/- along with interest.
Evidence:
I am of the view that plaintiff has established a case and plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of Rs.7,28,777/- with interest from defendants.
Relief Type: Interest
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Interest is to be paid at the rate of 12% from the date of suit till the date of decree and 6% from the date of decree till payment.
Evidence:
Defendants are directed to pay interest at the rate of 12% per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree, and 6% from the date of decree till the date of payment or realization.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is entitled to realize the costs of the suit.
Evidence:
Plaintiff is also entitled to realize the costs of the suit.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Letter of Authorization
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Authorized Mr. M.B Sanjeev to represent the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Tax Invoice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Documented the sale of goods to the 1st defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Tax Invoice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Documented the sale of goods to the 1st defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Tax Invoice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Documented the sale of goods to the 1st defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Notified the defendants of their outstanding dues.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Confirms the sending of the lawyer notice.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Confirms the sending of the lawyer notice.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Returned Envelope
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Shows that the notice sent to the 1st defendant was returned undelivered.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Acknowledgment card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Confirms receipt of notification by the 2nd defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A9

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between Southern Phosphate & Mineral vs Mahavishnu Agro Service regarding realization of money
Case Code Year
Case between Southern Phosphate & Mineral vs Mahavishnu Agro Service regarding realization of money

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 10/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 10/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Associated Rubber Chemicals (Kochi) Pvt Ltd vs M/s Malabar Paints & Colours Pvt Ltd et al regarding suit for money.
THE MUNSIFF COURT, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Maker Village vs M/s. V Robotics Innovations Private Limited et al regarding realization of money.
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Bajaj Electricals Limited vs Viswas Marketting Agencies regarding realization of money
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between PREFire Solutions vs Ernakulam Tourist Bungalow et al regarding realization of money
Court of Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s M D George and Company vs M/s Zillion Infrastructure (P) Ltd. regarding realization of money and mandatory injunction.
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won