Case Summary
The petitioner, Manoj Thekiniath, filed an eviction petition against the respondent, Sabitha Nazir, under the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965. The court found that the respondent did not comply with prior court orders, leading to the closure of the proceedings.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The court directed the respondent to put the landlord in possession of the property.
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the application of the respondent due to non-compliance with previous orders and ordered the respondent to vacate the property.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The respondent did not comply with the orders of the court.
The respondent did not comply with the orders of the court.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The respondent did not comply with the orders of the court.
The respondent did not comply with the orders of the court.
Supporting Evidence
Respondent did not comply orders in IA 05/2023 passed under Section 12 (1) of the Act, on 28.10.2023.
Judgment Evidence:
Respondent/tenant is directed to put the landlord/petitioner in possession of the petition schedule property under Section 12 (3) of the Act.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Manoj Thekiniath
- Party Age
- 50
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sabitha Nazir
- Party Age
- 34
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Philip T. Varghese
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Thomas T. Varghese
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Achu Shubha Abraham
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Nitya R.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Amala Purushothaman
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Amrutha Ramesh
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Adhil P.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Gayathri Vijayan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Mihirsa M.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Derick Mathai Saji
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Angel Mariya Biju
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sasi N.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sumson T.S.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Eviction
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Respondent/tenant is directed to put the landlord/petitioner in possession of the petition schedule property.
Evidence:
Respondent/ tenant is directed to put the landlord/petitioner in possession of the petition schedule property under Section 12 (3) of the Act.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Eviction
Case Code
Case between Manoj Thekiniath vs Sabitha Nazir regarding petition for eviction
Case Code Year
Case between Manoj Thekiniath vs Sabitha Nazir regarding petition for eviction