Case Summary
S. Ramachandra Panicker filed a petition for eviction against Ansar under the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965. A compromise was reached between the parties, and the court accepted the terms.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the rent control petition based on the terms of compromise, with one clause excluded.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The terms of compromise were found lawful and accepted.
The terms of compromise were found lawful and accepted.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The terms of compromise were found lawful and accepted.
The terms of compromise were found lawful and accepted.
Supporting Evidence
Heard on terms of compromise, the terms of which are found lawful. Hence, accepted.
Judgment Evidence:
Rent control petition is allowed, in terms of compromise, except clause No. 9 in the above compromise.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- S. Ramachandra Panicker
- Party Age
- 80
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Ansar
- Party Age
- 40
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Shibu Joseph
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Anupama R
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Gayathri Krishnan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sanu S Malakeel
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Ajith Viswanathan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Balram S.A.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- V.C. Xavier
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Drisya Kamal
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Agnet Jarard
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Jeffin John.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Fadil Faztl
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Pooja P.O.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Bincy
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Millu Dandapani
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Eviction
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Rent control petition is allowed in terms of compromise.
Evidence:
Rent control petition is allowed, in terms of compromise, except clause No. 9 in the above compromise.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Compromise IA
Submitted By:
Court
Relevance:
The court accepted the lawful terms of the compromise and recorded the terms and conditions.
Reference:
IA 02/2023
Case Classification
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Eviction
Case Code
Case between S. Ramachandra Panicker vs Ansar regarding eviction
Case Code Year
Case between S. Ramachandra Panicker vs Ansar regarding eviction
Case Flags
Out-of-Court Settlement