Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
Election Op. No. 3/2021

Case between Jose George vs Jacob Thomas regarding local body election candidacy

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Judge
Smt. Jyothi Babu R.
Order Date
2025-03-28
Duration
approximately-4 months 21 days
Case Closed
Fri, 03/28/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Jose George filed a petition challenging the election of Jacob Thomas as a returned candidate for Ward No.VIII of Akalakkunnam Gramapanchayat. The petitioner claimed that the respondent suppressed material facts in his nomination paper.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The petition filed by Jose George was dismissed by the court. The court found that the allegations of suppression of facts by Jacob Thomas were not proven.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Election Petition
Final Judgment
No
The petition filed by Jose George was dismissed by the court. The court found that the allegations of suppression of facts by Jacob Thomas were not proven.
Key Reasoning:
The petitioner could not establish that the details entered in Form 2A were fake or contained material suppression.
Why Defendant Won:
The petitioner could not establish that the details entered in Form 2A were fake or contained material suppression.
Supporting Evidence
The petitioner alleged that the details furnished in Form No.2A with respect to the assets of the respondent and also his wife and his mother with his nomination paper were incomplete. As stated, the petitioner has not pleaded that the particulars furnished in Form No.2A are fake.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, The petition is dismissed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Jose George
Party Age
58
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Jacob Thomas
Party Age
57
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Certified copy of Form No.2 (Nomination Paper), Certified copy of Form No.2(a) (Nomination Paper), Copy of letter given by the Returning Officer to the petitioner, Copy of Voters list of Akalakunnam Grama Panchayath Ward No. 8.
Defendants Documents
Marklist of Pre-Degree by Kerala University, Transfer Certificate of School of Distance Education, Course Certificate.

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
B. Ashok
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sethulakshmi K.
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
V.K. Sathyavan Nair
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Jossy Bastian
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Declaration
Outcome: Refused
Description:
Petitioner sought to declare the election of the respondent as void.
Evidence:
In the light of the above discussion, it can be held that the petitioner could not establish his case and hence he is not entitled to the relief prayed for.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Nomination Paper
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of the Form No.2 (Nomination Paper) submitted by the respondent.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Nomination Paper
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of the Form No.2(a) submitted by the respondent during the election.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of letter given by the Returning Officer to the petitioner.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Voters list
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of Voters list of Akalakunnam Grama Panchayath Ward No. 8.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Marklist
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Marklists of Pre-Degree by Kerala University submitted by the respondent to establish educational qualification.
Reference:
Ext.B1 series
Document Type: Transfer Certificate
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Transfer Certificate from School of Distance Education regarding the respondent's educational qualification.
Reference:
Ext.B2
Document Type: Course Certificate
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Course Certificate issued by the School of Distance Education confirming the respondent's degree.
Reference:
Ext.B3
Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Tax Receipt provided by the respondent.
Reference:
Ext.B4
Document Type: Various Exhibits
Submitted By: Unknown
Relevance:
Various third-party exhibits marked for consideration without specific context.
Reference:
Ext.X1 to Ext.X17

Case Classification

Case Type
Election Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Jose George vs Jacob Thomas regarding local body election candidacy
Case Code Year
Case between Jose George vs Jacob Thomas regarding local body election candidacy

Quick Facts

Location
Kottayam
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Case Filed
Wed, 12/16/2020 - 12:00
Case Closed
Fri, 03/28/2025 - 12:00
From
Sat, 03/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 03/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between A. Biju @ Biju Aravind vs T. G. Girish regarding Declaration under Section 163 to 169 and Section 178 of the Kerala Municipalities Act, 1994.
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF
Election Petition Defendant Won
Case between Mini Kumari vs Soumya et al regarding election petition
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Election Petition Defendant Won
Case between Adv.Naseema Shanavas vs Alfonsa Mathew et al regarding election petition.
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF – I, KOZHIKODE
Election Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Rahul Raj.R vs V.S. Sulochanan regarding election petition
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Election Petition Defendant Won
Case between Shaji Salim @ Shaji vs Abhilash, Shabu Gopalan @ Shabu, Sajeev P Menon @ Sajeev, Greenish Kumar P S regarding election petition
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Election Petition Defendant Won