Case Summary
The case involves a petition filed by A. Biju for a declaration under the Kerala Municipalities Act against T. G. Girish. Both parties were absent during the hearing, leading to the petition being dismissed for default.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Election Petition
Final Judgment
No
The petition was dismissed for default due to the absence of both the petitioner and the respondent.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Petitioner absent no representation. Respondent absent no representation. Petitioner called absent. Petition dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- A. Biju @ Biju Aravind
- Party Age
- 55
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- T. G. Girish
- Party Age
- 36
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Petitioner
- Advocate Name
- Vilayil A. Rajeev
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Respondent
- Advocate Name
- G. Gopakumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Declaration
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
The petition for Declaration under Section 163 to 169 and Section 178 of the Kerala Municipalities Act, 1994.
Evidence:
Petitioner absent no representation. Respondent absent no representation. Petitioner called absent. Petition dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Election Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between A. Biju @ Biju Aravind vs T. G. Girish regarding Declaration under Section 163 to 169 and Section 178 of the Kerala Municipalities Act, 1994.
Case Code Year
Case between A. Biju @ Biju Aravind vs T. G. Girish regarding Declaration under Section 163 to 169 and Section 178 of the Kerala Municipalities Act, 1994.