Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
S.T No. 41 /2023

Case between Benny Varghese vs Ashik Shaju regarding withdrawal of complaint

Court
Judl. Ist Class Magistrate – II, Pala
Judge
Smt. Kavya S.S
Order Date
2025-04-15
Duration
approximately-2 years 5 months
Case Closed
Tue, 04/15/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Benny Varghese filed a complaint against Ashik Shaju under the Negotiable Instruments Act. The complainant sought to withdraw the complaint, and the court found sufficient grounds to allow the withdrawal.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the complainant to withdraw the complaint against the accused, resulting in the acquittal of the accused.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Criminal Case
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the complainant to withdraw the complaint against the accused, resulting in the acquittal of the accused.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court was satisfied that there were sufficient grounds for the complainant to withdraw the complaint.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court was satisfied that there were sufficient grounds for the complainant to withdraw the complaint.
Supporting Evidence
I am satisfied that there are sufficient grounds to allow the complainant to withdraw the complaint.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, the complainant is allowed to withdraw the complaint and the accused is acquitted u/s 257 Cr.P.C.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Benny Varghese
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ashik Shaju
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
George Joseph Kakkanattu
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Thomas Davis
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
V.G. Venugopal
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Thomas Joseph Thoonkuzy
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The complainant is allowed to withdraw the complaint and the accused is acquitted.
Evidence:
I am satisfied that there are sufficient grounds to allow the complainant to withdraw the complaint. Hence, the complainant is allowed to withdraw the complaint and the accused is acquitted u/s 257 Cr.P.C.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Criminal Case
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Pala
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Benny Varghese vs Ashik Shaju regarding withdrawal of complaint
Case Code Year
Case between Benny Varghese vs Ashik Shaju regarding withdrawal of complaint

Case Flags

Cheque-Related Case
Nature of Cheque Case
Cheque Dishonour under Section 138 N.I. Act

Quick Facts

Location
Pala
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Pala
Case Filed
Wed, 12/09/2020 - 12:00
Case Closed
Tue, 04/15/2025 - 12:00
From
Tue, 04/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Thu, 07/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between George Jacob vs Joseph Sebastian regarding U/s.138 of N.I. Act
IN THE COURT OF JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE-II, PALA
Criminal Case Defendant Won
Case between Ashish A.R vs Leji Paul regarding U/s.138 of N.I. Act.
COURT OF JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE-II, PALA
Criminal Case Defendant Won
Case between Sojan Francis vs Soumya Saji regarding Punishable U/s 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act
IN THE COURT OF THE JUDL. Ist CLASS MAGISTRATE – II
Criminal Case Defendant Won
Case between Unnikrishnan K.R vs Shamnas regarding withdrawal of complaint
Judicial First Class Magistrate – II
Criminal Case Defendant Won
Case between Ragul K.R. vs Santha Suresh et al regarding U/s 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act.
COURT OF THE JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE - II, PALA
Criminal Case Defendant Won