Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ST No.12/2021

Case between Ashish A.R vs Leji Paul regarding U/s.138 of N.I. Act.

Court
COURT OF JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE-II, PALA
Judge
Sri.Hasheem S
Order Date
2025-10-24
Duration
approximately-4 years 6 months
Case Closed
Fri, 10/24/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves a complaint by Ashish A.R against Leji Paul under the Negotiable Instruments Act. The complaint was dismissed as the complainant was continuously absent.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The complaint was dismissed and the accused was acquitted as the complainant did not appear.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Criminal Case
Final Judgment
No
The complaint was dismissed and the accused was acquitted as the complainant did not appear.
Key Reasoning:
The complainant was not diligently prosecuting the complaint.
Why Defendant Won:
The complainant was not diligently prosecuting the complaint.
Supporting Evidence
I am satisfied that the complainant is not diligently prosecuting the complaint.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence the complaint is dismissed under section 256 CrPC . Accused is acquitted.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Ashish A.R
Party Age
43
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Leji Paul
Party Age
43
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Biju Abraham
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Shabeer Ali Mohammed
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Lilta John
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Babu T Cheriyan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The complaint is dismissed under section 256 CrPC due to the complainant's absence.
Evidence:
I am satisfied that the complainant is not diligently prosecuting the complaint. Hence the complaint is dismissed under section 256 CrPC.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Acquitted
Description:
The accused is acquitted.
Evidence:
Accused is acquitted.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Criminal Case
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Pala
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Ashish A.R vs Leji Paul regarding U/s.138 of N.I. Act.
Case Code Year
Case between Ashish A.R vs Leji Paul regarding U/s.138 of N.I. Act.

Case Flags

Cheque-Related Case
Nature of Cheque Case
Cheque Dishonour under Section 138 N.I. Act

Quick Facts

Location
Pala
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Pala
Case Filed
Wed, 04/21/2021 - 12:00
Case Closed
Fri, 10/24/2025 - 12:00
From
Fri, 08/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 10/27/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between George Jacob vs Joseph Sebastian regarding U/s.138 of N.I. Act
IN THE COURT OF JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE-II, PALA
Criminal Case Defendant Won
Case between Benny Varghese vs Ashik Shaju regarding withdrawal of complaint
Judl. Ist Class Magistrate – II, Pala
Criminal Case Plaintiff Won
Case between Sojan Francis vs Soumya Saji regarding Punishable U/s 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act
IN THE COURT OF THE JUDL. Ist CLASS MAGISTRATE – II
Criminal Case Defendant Won
Case between Unnikrishnan K.R vs Shamnas regarding withdrawal of complaint
Judicial First Class Magistrate – II
Criminal Case Defendant Won
Case between Ragul K.R. vs Santha Suresh et al regarding U/s 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act.
COURT OF THE JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE - II, PALA
Criminal Case Defendant Won