Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OP.(Election). No. 2/2021

Case between Anilkumar vs Savad regarding election petition.

Court
IN THE COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, KOLLAM.
Judge
Smt. Sofia.T.A
Order Date
2025-11-01
Duration
approximately-5 years
Case Closed
Sat, 11/01/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Anilkumar filed a petition challenging the election of Savad as void. The dispute involves allegations regarding the qualifications and identity of the respondent in the electoral process.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The petition was dismissed, confirming the respondent's election as valid.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Election Petition
Final Judgment
No
The petition was dismissed, confirming the respondent's election as valid.
Key Reasoning:
The court found the petition challenging the election not maintainable as the necessary pleadings were not established.
Why Defendant Won:
The court found the petition challenging the election not maintainable as the necessary pleadings were not established.
Supporting Evidence
The evidence established that the respondent's nomination was valid and no substantial irregularity was proven.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the original petition is dismissed. The parties are directed to bear their own respective costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Anilkumar
Party Age
45
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Savad
Party Age
49
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Attested true copy of nomination and declaration, Certified copy of Release Deed No.4214/2000, Voters List, 2020.
Defendants Documents
Nomination issued under RTI Act, Certificate of Enrollment, Certificate issued from University of Law, Faculty of Law.

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Ramesh Kumar R
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
K.Somasekharan Pillai
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Nomination and declaration
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Attested true copy of nomination and declaration
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Certified copy of Release Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of Release Deed No.4214/2000
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Election publicity booklet
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Booklet published in connection with election publicity (marked as subject to proof)
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Photographs
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Photographs (4 nos.)(rejected not complied S.63 of BNS)
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Voters List, 2020
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Voters List, 2020 (marked as subject to proof)
Reference:
Ext.B1
Document Type: Nomination issued under RTI Act
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Nomination issued under RTI Act (marked as subject to proof)
Reference:
Ext.B2
Document Type: Certificate of Enrollment
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Certificate of Enrollment(marked as subject to proof)
Reference:
Ext.B3
Document Type: Certificate from University of Law
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Certificate issued from University of Law, Faculty of Law
Reference:
Ext.B4
Document Type: Certificate from University of Kerala
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Certificate issued from University of Kerala, Faculty of Social Sciences
Reference:
Ext.B5
Document Type: Attested true copy of Adhar
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Attested true copy of Adhar of respondent
Reference:
Ext.B6
Document Type: Attested true copy of Election ID
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Attested true copy of Election ID of the respondent
Reference:
Ext.B7
Document Type: Attested true copy of PAN
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Attested true copy of PAN of the respondent
Reference:
Ext.B8
Document Type: Attested true copy of Gazette Notification
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Attested true copy of Gazette Notification
Reference:
Ext.B9
Document Type: Nomination
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Nomination (Form No.2)
Reference:
Ext.X6
Document Type: Form 2A
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Form No.2A
Reference:
Ext.X6(a)
Document Type: Nomination
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Nomination (Form No.2)
Reference:
Ext.X7
Document Type: Form 2A
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Form No.2A
Reference:
Ext.X7(a)

Case Classification

Case Type
Election Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Anilkumar vs Savad regarding election petition.
Case Code Year
Case between Anilkumar vs Savad regarding election petition.

Quick Facts

Location
Kollam
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Case Filed
Mon, 11/01/2021 - 12:00
Case Closed
Sat, 11/01/2025 - 12:00
From
Wed, 10/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 11/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between A. Biju @ Biju Aravind vs T. G. Girish regarding Declaration under Section 163 to 169 and Section 178 of the Kerala Municipalities Act, 1994.
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF
Election Petition Defendant Won
Case between Mini Kumari vs Soumya et al regarding election petition
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Election Petition Defendant Won
Case between Adv.Naseema Shanavas vs Alfonsa Mathew et al regarding election petition.
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF – I, KOZHIKODE
Election Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Rahul Raj.R vs V.S. Sulochanan regarding election petition
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Election Petition Defendant Won
Case between Shaji Salim @ Shaji vs Abhilash, Shabu Gopalan @ Shabu, Sajeev P Menon @ Sajeev, Greenish Kumar P S regarding election petition
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Election Petition Defendant Won