Similar Cases
Based on: O.S.No.51/2022 — Case between Sreethu P N vs George P M et al regarding temporary injunction for use of a road.
48 matching cases found, ranked by shared legal context
O. S. No.427/2017
Case between Rev. Fr. K George Jacob vs Vengola Grama Panchayath regarding mandatory injunction and permanent prohibitory injunction
Rev. Fr. K George Jacob filed a suit against Vengola Grama Panchayath for a mandatory and permanent prohibitory injunction. The plaintiff alleges that the Panchayath obstructed the natural flow of rainwater, causing flooding in his property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S.No. 314 /2021
Case between Mohammed Faisal vs Mulavukad Grama Panchayath regarding interim injunction
The case involves petitioners Mohammed Faisal and Shejinamol seeking an interim injunction against the Mulavukad Grama Panchayath to prevent construction on the northern side of their property. The court found the petition barred by res judicata as a similar matter had previously been decided.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS No. 08 / 2024
Case between Shaji Varghese et al vs Thiruvaniyoor Grama Panchayat et al regarding temporary injunction
The plaintiffs, Shaji Varghese and Baby, seek a temporary injunction against the defendants, which include Thiruvaniyoor Grama Panchayat and Ajimon.K.M, to prevent them from trespassing on their property and demolishing a compound wall. The dispute centers on the ownership and boundaries of several plots of land.
Civil Suit
O.S. No. 922/2021
Case between Lalithamma Radhakrishna Menon vs Cheranellor Grama Panchayath regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiffs, Lalithamma Radhakrishna Menon and her daughter Smitha Radhakrishna Menon, are seeking permanent prohibitory injunction against the Cheranellor Grama Panchayath, claiming that the Grama Panchayath has no authority to maintain a pathway they co-own. The Grama Panchayath contends that the pathway is public and they have the right to maintain it.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 314/2021
Case between Mohammed Faisal et al vs Mulavukad Grama Panchayath regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
The case involves plaintiffs Mohammed Faisal and his wife Shejinamol seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the Mulavukad Grama Panchayath to prevent construction obstructing their access to a public road. Plaintiffs claim ownership and access rights to their property, while the Panchayath argues it holds valid authority to construct an Anganvadi on the disputed land.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No. 300 /2019
Case between Mr. John Peter vs Edakkattuvayal Grama Panchayat et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Mr. John Peter filed a suit for a permanent prohibitory injunction against Edakkattuvayal Grama Panchayat and others. The matter was settled in mediation, and the terms were accepted by the court.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S.No. 314 /2 021
Case between Mohammed Faisal et al vs Mulavukad Grama Panchayath regarding approved building plan
The petitioners, Mohammed Faisal and Shejinamol, are seeking relief concerning the construction of a building. The respondent is the Mulavukad Grama Panchayath.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS No. 13 / 2021
Case between C.V.Peter vs Alias George et al regarding declaration of prescriptive easement and permanent prohibitory injunction
The case involves C.V.Peter seeking declaration of prescriptive easement and permanent prohibitory injunction against Alias George and others.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No.15/2018
Case between Asokan vs Jaya Babu, Ramesan K K et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Asokan, the plaintiff, is seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, Jaya Babu and Ramesan K K, who are allegedly encroaching upon his property. The plaintiff asserts his right to the property based on previous ownership and seeks relief from interference by the defendants.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
E.A. 124/2025
Case between Malathi vs Government of Kerala et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Case involves petition for execution of decree regarding drainage water and waste reaching the plaintiff's property in violation of a permanent prohibitory injunction.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 1230/2023
Case between Karthika Pradeep vs Sulthana Habeeb et al regarding Permanent prohibitory injunction and other reliefs
Plaintiff, a MBBS graduate, runs an educational consultancy firm. Defendants demanded refund for failed transaction and threatened. Plaintiff seeks a permanent injunction against threats and trespassing.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS No. 976/2024
Case between Benny John et al vs Anivrithan regarding temporary injunction
The plaintiffs, Benny John and Reena, sought a temporary injunction against the defendant, Anivrithan, to prevent him from selling a property involved in a disputed sale agreement. The defendant contested the allegations, claiming no such agreement existed.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No. 346/2024
Case between Coconut Grove Residents Association vs Maradu Municipality regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The Coconut Grove Residents Association, represented by its Secretary Dr. Stephen Puthumana, filed a suit against Maradu Municipality seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction to prevent the Municipality from interfering with the private road maintained by the Association. The Municipality issued a notice demanding proof of road ownership and threatened to remove a cross bar installed to control unauthorized access.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S No. 142/2021
Case between Nicolas P Dias et al vs M.K.Aboobacker et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Nicolas P Dias and Mercy Simenthy have filed a case against M.K.Aboobacker and others for a permanent prohibitory injunction to prevent obstruction on a road they use. They argue that the defendants unlawfully obstructed necessary gas and water pipeline installations.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No.856/2018
Case between Jayan. K.S et al vs M/s. Tata Motors Finance Ltd et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiffs, Jayan. K.S and Jayakumari Jayan, are a husband and wife facing threats from the defendants, M/s. Tata Motors Finance Ltd and its officers, regarding a loan for a truck. They seek a permanent injunction to prevent the defendants from entering their rented house and making threats related to the loan.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 835/2025
Case between Biju B.R. vs Sree Narayan Dharma Samajam et al regarding interim injunction to restrain resolution implementation
Biju B.R. has filed a petition for an interim injunction against Sree Narayan Dharma Samajam and its officers. The petitioner claims a resolution allowing male devotees to wear shirts in a temple was passed improperly and seeks to prevent its implementation.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No. 261/2024
Case between Joji Joseph et al vs Sabu N Y et al regarding temporary injunction
The plaintiffs, Joji Joseph and Reni Joji, are seeking a temporary injunction against the defendants, Sabu N Y and Varghese, regarding the obstruction of water flow and access to their property. The defendants are accused of illegally constructing a compound wall and obstructing drainage.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S.No.45/2016
Case between Ibrahim and Rahna vs Poulose et al regarding restoration of a suit
Ibrahim and Rahna filed a petition to restore their suit after it was dismissed for default due to their absence. The court found their reasons for not appearing unconvincing and dismissed the petition.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No. 13/2018
Case between M/s Swapna Bone Meal Co. vs V.J. Joy et al regarding perpetual injunction
M/s Swapna Bone Meal Co. seeks a perpetual injunction against V.J. Joy and others to prevent them from obstructing the operation of the bone meal unit. The defendants claim that the operation is illegal, causing environmental pollution and health risks to nearby residents.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 281/2021
Case between Pathumma vs Beena Subair et al regarding perpetual injunction
Pathumma filed a suit against Beena Subair and Linto Monon P. seeking a perpetual injunction to restrain the defendants from forcefully entering her property. The court found that the defendants had no rights over the property in question.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 138/2022
Case between M.R. Gopinadhan Nair vs Secretary Perumbavoor Municipality regarding perpetual injunction and mandatory injunction
The case involves M.R. Gopinadhan Nair as the plaintiff, who is asking for a perpetual and mandatory injunction against the Secretary of the Perumbavoor Municipality and others regarding unauthorized constructions. The plaintiff claims that the defendants have violated building rules and encroached on his property.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.75/2025
Case between Varghese vs State of Kerala et al regarding ownership and possession of property
The petitioner Varghese claims ownership and possession over a property and fears that the respondents are attempting to divert rainwater into his property, which may cause damage. The respondents argue that the water flow into the property is natural and has existed for decades.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS No.158/2025
Case between Chandran et al vs Sarala Vasu et al regarding ad-interim injunction
The plaintiffs, Chandran, Lakshmi, and Velayudhan M A, are seeking an ad-interim injunction against the defendants, Sarala Vasu, Sudha Surendran, V T Bava, and Fathima Bava, to prevent obstruction of their right of way through a specified pathway.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS No.336/2024
Case between Subramanyan et al vs M/s. Manju Industries regarding temporary injunction against operating a metal crusher unit
The petitioners, Subramanyan and others, are seeking a temporary injunction against M/s. Manju Industries to prevent them from operating a metal crusher unit that allegedly causes air and noise pollution. The petitioners claim that the operation of the crusher unit violates environmental regulations and disrupts their quality of life.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 47/2025
Case between Jenin Daniel vs Canara Bank regarding injunction on property possession
Jenin Daniel seeks an injunction against Canara Bank to stop them from taking possession of his property, claiming it is not part of a mortgage. The bank argues that the property in question is secured under a loan agreement.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 1549/2019
Case between Sasi vs Chokli et al regarding Permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiffs, Sasi and Soumini, are seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendant, Chokli, who attempted to obstruct their access to a pathway critical for their property. The case was brought due to concerns over the defendant's attempts to encroach on the pathway, impacting the plaintiffs' peaceful possession and enjoyment of their land.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S No. 76/2025
Case between Muhammed Rija P.M vs Thrikkakara Municipality regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Muhammed Rija P.M filed a suit against Thrikkakara Municipality seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction after the municipality removed a business signboard without proper notice. The court found that while the municipality could not act without due process, it could not impose a blanket prohibition on the municipality's actions.
Civil Suit
Partial
O.S. No. 292/2025
Case between Samson T George et al vs Arun Kumar Karerat et al regarding temporary injunction
This case involves petitioners Samson T George and Babu Mathew seeking a temporary injunction against the respondents Arun Kumar Karerat, Samson Fernandez, Annerine Mildred D’Silva, and MIR Realtors Pvt. Ltd. The petitioners argue that failure to grant the injunction will cause them irreparable harm.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No.1125/2024
Case between Leena Sham vs M/s Google L L C et al regarding a permanent prohibitory injunction.
Leena Sham has filed a suit against YouTube and her daughter, Sharikka Sham, seeking a permanent injunction to remove a video uploaded by her deceased son. The video is claimed to violate her privacy and has caused distress to the family after the son's death.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 725 /2024
Case between P A Jihas et al vs Edwin Correya et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
The plaintiffs, including P A Jihas and Jewel Homes Pvt. Ltd., are involved in a dispute with the defendants over the maintenance of a residential complex. The plaintiffs seek an injunction to prevent the defendants from trespassing and obstructing access to their property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 725/2022
Case between Anitha Kumari K.G et al vs Unnikrishnan et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiffs, Anitha Kumari K.G and Anil Kumar K.G, are seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the first defendant, Unnikrishnan, related to a goat shed operating unlawfully nearby. They claim the shed has caused severe air and water pollution, affecting their health and living conditions.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No. 626 /2022
Case between Aseeb vs Nahas et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiff, Aseeb, a senior citizen, is seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction to prevent the defendants from obstructing his access to a pathway that he claims is essential for ingress and egress to his property. The defendants, relatives of the plaintiff, contest the existence of the claimed pathway and the plaintiff's rights over it.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No. 995 / 2019
Case between Suresh Babu T vs Kiran M B et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiff, Suresh Babu T, filed a suit against Kiran M B and Grace Cheriyan for a permanent prohibitory injunction to prevent his forcible eviction from a leased property. The plaintiff claims he invested significantly in his business and fears illegal dispossession by the defendants.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 571 / 2020
Case between M/s Sinergia Media Labs LLP vs M/s Smart City (Kochi) Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiff, M/s Sinergia Media Labs LLP, filed a suit against the defendant, M/s Smart City (Kochi) Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd, seeking protection against eviction and service disruption. The case revolves around alleged non-payment of rent during the COVID-19 pandemic and the plaintiff's apprehension of unlawful eviction.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 1255 / 2017
Case between Nicemol Nishad alias Nice Nishad vs Sivadasan et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiff, Nicemol Nishad, claims ownership of a residential property and seeks a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, Sivadasan and Mohanan, who have unlawfully attempted to trespass and encroach upon her property. The defendants contest the plaintiff's claims and assert ownership of a strip of land adjacent to her property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S No. 45/2025
Case between Sharlimon M.K vs Santhosh regarding temporary prohibitory injunction
Sharlimon M.K, the plaintiff, seeks a temporary prohibitory injunction against Santhosh, the defendant, who is allegedly threatening to misuse blank signed cheques and stamp papers. The plaintiff claims a significant amount is due, while the defendant denies the allegations and states he has been threatened.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 244 / 2023
Case between M/s Melmont Constructions Pvt. Ltd. et al vs Jayesh et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
The plaintiffs, M/s Melmont Constructions Pvt. Ltd. and others, are seeking a permanent injunction against the defendants, who are members of the Youth Wing of 'Lok Tantric Janata Dal', for obstructing access to the plaintiffs' development project in Ernakulam. The defendants staged protests claiming illegal activities by the plaintiffs.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 563/2025
Case between Jisha Mathew vs Jasar M K et al regarding temporary injunction.
Jisha Mathew, acting as the authorized agent of Mr. Ranjith Krishnan, filed a petition for temporary injunction against Jasar M K and Anas M A, who are alleged to have dumped waste on the property owned by Mr. Ranjith. The defendants denied the allegations and claimed ownership rights over the property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 1241/2018
Case between Vimal Arackal, Bindhu Vimal vs Shaji regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiffs, Vimal Arackal and Bindhu Vimal, are husband and wife, who own adjacent parcels of land in Ernakulam District. They are seeking an injunction against their neighbor, Shaji, to prevent encroachment upon their property.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S No. 525/2023
Case between Royal John vs Joseph Xavier regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiff, Royal John, has filed a suit against the defendant, Joseph Xavier, for a permanent prohibitory injunction to prevent obstruction of his right of way to his property. The defendant allegedly threatened to obstruct the plaintiff's access to his property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 436 of 2022
Case between K.J Thomas et al vs Saumya Maju et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
K.J Thomas and others are plaintiffs seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against Saumya Maju and others. The case concerns excavation activities by the defendants that threaten the plaintiffs' properties.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S No. 849/2021
Case between Dileep Kumar T.P vs T.R.Suresh regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Dileep Kumar T.P, the plaintiff, sought a permanent prohibitory injunction against T.R.Suresh, the defendant, to prevent him from trespassing on his property and demolishing a compound wall. The case arose from a dispute over a pathway and property ownership following a partition deed.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S No. 864/2020
Case between Jayadevi et al vs Surendran et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
This case involves a dispute over the use of a pathway adjacent to the plaintiffs' property. The plaintiffs claim the right to a pathway for ingress and egress, while the defendants contend there is no such pathway as described.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No.1092/2019
Case between Ajeesh Krishnan et al vs Thuravoor Suresh et al regarding declaration and injunction
The plaintiffs are Ajeesh Krishnan and Haridas T.P, who are members of the Kerala Pulayar Mahasabha (KPMS). They seek a declaration and injunction against the defendants claiming to be the office bearers of KPMS despite being removed due to misconduct.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 662 /2023
Case between World Malayalee Council Trust (India Region) et al vs Mr. Dominic Joseph et al regarding declaration and injunction
The plaintiffs, World Malayalee Council Trust and its Chairperson, are suing the defendants for misrepresentation and injunction. The defendants falsely claimed to represent the plaintiffs and conducted unauthorized activities, leading to potential financial loss and damage to the plaintiffs' reputation.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 349 / 2024
Case between Mokim Ali vs Kochi Municipal Corporation regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Mokim Ali is the plaintiff seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the Kochi Municipal Corporation. The plaintiff fears illegal eviction from the property they are leasing to conduct a scrap collection business.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 756/2023
Case between Yoonus et al vs Hidayathul Islam Jama-Ath Committee et al regarding injunction
The plaintiffs, members of Hidayathul Islam Jamaath, sought injunction against the defendants, who administer the Jamaath. The court found it had no jurisdiction over the case as it involved waqf property.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S No. 545/2024
Case between Soni Francis et al vs Pioneer Nirman India Pvt. (Ltd) et al regarding mandatory injunction
The plaintiffs, Soni Francis and Lizzy Francis, claim their right to an exclusive car parking facility in a property owned by them in Pioneer Towers. They have been denied this right by the defendants, who are involved in managing the property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won