| Niyamam AI

Displaying 15001 - 15005 of 15270

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Secretary vs Kuppantepurakkal Nooh regarding debt recovery

Civil Suit - Debt Recovery

EP 269/2013

Tirur, Malappuram

2014-05-27

0 years, 6 months, 16 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Aboobacker vs Muhammed Kutty Haji regarding cheque dishonour

Cheque Dishonour Case

S.T. No:5/2014

Tirur

2014-05-27

1 year

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Rahiyanath vs Nahmarali regarding offence under Section 138 of N.I. Act

Criminal Case - Offence under Section 138 of N.I. Act

S.T. No:6/2014 (Refiled from S.T.192/2013 of J.F.C.M-1, Tirur)

Tirur

2014-05-27

1 year

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Abdul Khader vs Abdul Hameed regarding dishonour of cheque under the Negotiable Instruments Act

Criminal Case - Offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act

S.T. No:96/2012

Tirur

2014-05-27

2 years 1 day

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Abdul Khader vs Abdul Hameed regarding cheque dishonour

Criminal Case - Cheque Dishonour under Section 138 of N.I. Act

S.T. No:154/2012

Tirur

2014-05-27

1 year

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

51%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 15,270 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.3 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 807 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 682 cases)
Sale deed (in 574 cases)
Postal receipt (in 543 cases)
Tax receipt (in 530 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 7721
Defendant Won: 6453

6453

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

25%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs frequently failed to pay necessary court fees, resulting in automatic case dismissals.

Found in 25 cases (25%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Plaintiffs often did not provide adequate evidence proving their claims or the means of respondents.

Found in 21 cases (21%) High Impact

Absence of the Plaintiff

Many cases were dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence during court proceedings.

Found in 19 cases (19%) Medium Impact

Failure to Take Action

Plaintiffs consistently failed to take necessary actions, such as issuing notices or filing required documents.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Presented

Absence of the Plaintiff

Failure to Take Action

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?