| Niyamam AI

Displaying 14891 - 14895 of 15270

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Secretary vs Yasir Thottiyil regarding Decree Debt

Civil Suit - Recovery of Decree Debt

EP 288/2013

Tirur, Malappuram

2014-06-24

0 years, 6 months, 19 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Appunni et al vs Suresh Kumar et al regarding Restoration Petition

Restoration Petition

Restor.Ptn 205/2014

Tirur, Malappuram

2014-06-23

0 years, 5 months, 22 days

Unknown

View Full Details

Case between Pathiyil Aboobacker vs Nellikkal Muhammedali regarding restoration petition

Restoration Petition

Restor.Ptn 179/2014

Tirur, Malappuram

2014-06-23

0 years, 5 months, 22 days

Partial

View Full Details

Case between Chittakath Karthuveettil Ayisakutty et al vs Kottayil Kunhipocker et al regarding cost payment

Restoration Petition

Restor.Ptn 278/2014

Tirur, Malappuram

2014-06-23

0 years, 5 months, 19 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Muhammedali vs Pathiyil Aboobacker regarding civil decree

Civil Suit

EP 26/2014

Tirur, Malappuram

2014-06-23

0 years, 5 months, 22 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

51%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 15,270 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.3 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 807 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 682 cases)
Sale deed (in 574 cases)
Postal receipt (in 543 cases)
Tax receipt (in 530 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 7721
Defendant Won: 6453

6453

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

22%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs failed to pay the required court fees, leading to dismissal for default.

Found in 22 cases (22%) Medium Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Petitioners did not provide sufficient evidence to support their claims, resulting in dismissals.

Found in 20 cases (20%) Medium Impact

Absence of the Petitioner

Many cases were dismissed due to the petitioner's absence in court proceedings.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

Failure to Issue Notices

Cases were dismissed due to the failure to issue necessary legal notices to respondents.

Found in 16 cases (16%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Presented

Absence of the Petitioner

Failure to Issue Notices

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?