| Niyamam AI

Displaying 14856 - 14860 of 15270

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between K. P. Kabeer vs Shajahan Babu regarding offence under Section 138 of N.I. Act

Criminal Case

S.T. No: 138/2012

Tirur

2013-07-29

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Gokulam Chit & Finance Co Pvt Ltd vs Asmabi regarding cheque dishonour

Criminal Case - Cheque Dishonour

S.T. No:123/2012

Tirur

2013-07-27

3 years 28 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Sree Gokulam Chit & Finance Co. Pvt.Ltd vs Moidu regarding Cheque Dishonour

Criminal Case - Cheque Dishonour

S.T. No:94/2012

Tirur

2013-10-21

Less than 2 years

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Shamsudheen vs Sharbeena regarding eviction from rented property

Rent Control Petition under Kerala Building (Lease and Rent Control) Act 1965

RENT CONTROL PETITION NO. 12 OF 2012

Tirur

2014-03-31

Approximately 1 year & 9 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Shiju regarding loan default

Civil Suit - Money Recovery

Original Suit No. 47 OF 2014

Tirur

2014-03-29

1 day

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

51%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 15,270 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.3 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 807 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 682 cases)
Sale deed (in 574 cases)
Postal receipt (in 543 cases)
Tax receipt (in 530 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 7721
Defendant Won: 6453

6453

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

30%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Fees or Batta

Many petitions were dismissed due to the plaintiff's failure to pay necessary fees or batta.

Found in 30 cases (30%) High Impact

Absence of the Petitioner

Petitioners frequently failed to appear in court, leading to dismissals of their cases.

Found in 25 cases (25%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Provided

Dismissals often resulted from plaintiffs not presenting adequate evidence to support their claims.

Found in 20 cases (20%) Medium Impact

Failure to Take Steps

Many petitions were dismissed because plaintiffs did not take necessary procedural steps.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Fees or Batta

Absence of the Petitioner

Lack of Evidence Provided

Failure to Take Steps

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?