| Niyamam AI

Displaying 14781 - 14785 of 15270

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Enikkutty vs Siddeeq regarding settlement in Lok Adalath

Civil Suit

OS 275/2014

Tirur, Malappuram

2014-08-29

0 years, 1 month, 5 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between K.P.O.Kadeeja vs Kavithothu Fireesh Kumar regarding possession petition

Civil Suit - Possession Petition

EP 156/2013

Tirur, Malappuram

2014-08-29

1 year, 1 month, 26 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Secretary vs Cherachamveettil Kattiya kadavath Husain regarding default judgment

Default Judgment

EP 267/2013

Tirur, Malappuram

2014-08-28

0 years, 9 months, 17 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Moideen Haji vs Muhammed Saleem regarding property delivery

Civil Execution Petition

EP 294/2013

Tirur, Malappuram

2014-08-28

0 years, 8 months, 19 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Manager, M/s Popular Vehicles and Services Ltd vs Mohammed Haneefa regarding offence under section 138 of N.I. Act

Criminal Case - Negotiable Instruments Act Offence

ST. No:30/2014

Tirur

2014-08-28

1 year

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

51%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 15,270 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.3 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 807 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 682 cases)
Sale deed (in 574 cases)
Postal receipt (in 543 cases)
Tax receipt (in 530 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 7721
Defendant Won: 6453

6453

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

22%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Batta Fees

Plaintiffs frequently failed due to not paying required batta fees for processing petitions.

Found in 22 cases (22%) Medium Impact

Lack of Evidence Provided

Many cases were dismissed due to the plaintiffs' inability to present adequate evidence to support their claims.

Found in 20 cases (20%) Medium Impact

Failure to Take Necessary Steps

Several petitions were dismissed because plaintiffs did not take required procedural steps for their cases.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

Absence of Petitioners in Court

Dismissing petitions for default often resulted from the petitioners not appearing in court as required.

Found in 16 cases (16%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Batta Fees

Lack of Evidence Provided

Failure to Take Necessary Steps

Absence of Petitioners in Court

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?