| Niyamam AI

Displaying 14546 - 14550 of 15270

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Valiyakath Fathima alias Kunhibeevi vs Abdul Khader regarding non-production of commissioner batta

Civil Suit

FDA 1219/2014

Tirur, Malappuram

2015-01-16

0 years, 9 months, 8 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between The Secretary-In Charge vs Vakkat Purakkal Manikandan et al regarding default petition

Civil Suit

EP 22/2014

Tirur, Malappuram

2015-01-15

1 year, 0 months, 25 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between SreeGokulamChitFinance Co.(P)Ltd vs Chandran.K.P. et al regarding default judgment

Civil Suit

EP 23/2010

Tirur, Malappuram

2015-01-14

4 years, 10 months, 2 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Secretary vs Nambiarath Velayudhan et al regarding payment dispute

Civil Suit

EP 146/2014

Tirur, Malappuram

2015-01-14

0 years, 6 months, 27 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Thazhatheveettil Rajesh vs Paravannangadi Sreenivasan regarding Not mentioned

Not mentioned

Restor. 35/2014

Tirur, Malappuram

2015-01-12

1 year, 0 months, 23 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

51%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 15,270 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.3 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 807 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 682 cases)
Sale deed (in 574 cases)
Postal receipt (in 543 cases)
Tax receipt (in 530 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 7721
Defendant Won: 6453

6453

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

30%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Required Fees

Plaintiffs failed to pay necessary fees, leading to the dismissal of their petitions for default.

Found in 30 cases (30%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Plaintiffs did not provide sufficient evidence to support their claims or demonstrate financial means.

Found in 28 cases (28%) Medium Impact

Absence of Petitioner

Petitioners were not present in court, causing their petitions to be dismissed for default.

Found in 24 cases (24%) Medium Impact

Failure to Take Required Steps

Lack of follow-through on procedural steps, such as issuing notices, led to case dismissals.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Required Fees

Lack of Evidence Presented

Absence of Petitioner

Failure to Take Required Steps

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?