| Niyamam AI

Displaying 13921 - 13925 of 15270

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Secretary, Perumanna Klari Service Co-operative Bank vs Khadar et al regarding execution of decree

Execution Petition - Civil Procedure

Execution Petition No. 384/2015

Tirur

2016-11-28

1 year

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Arshad P.P. vs Sulthan regarding restoration petition

Civil Suit - Restoration Petition

Restor.Ptn 1156/2016

Tirur, Malappuram

2016-11-23

0 years, 6 months, 4 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Raveendra Nath et al vs Padmini regarding partition

Partition Suit

Original Suit No. 49 OF 2016

Tirur

2016-11-22

Not mentioned

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Secretary, Perumanna Klari service Co-operative Bank vs Sainudheen regarding execution of decree

Execution Petition

Execution Petition No. 16 of 2016

Tirur

2016-11-22

Not mentioned

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Secretary, Mangalam Service Co-operative Bank vs Legal heirs of Mankuzhi Pankajakshi et al regarding non-payment

Execution Petition

Execution Petition No.203 of 2016

Tirur

2016-11-22

Not mentioned

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

51%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 15,270 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.3 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 807 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 682 cases)
Sale deed (in 574 cases)
Postal receipt (in 543 cases)
Tax receipt (in 530 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 7721
Defendant Won: 6453

6453

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

42%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Batta Fees

Plaintiffs frequently failed to pay required batta fees, resulting in dismissal for default.

Found in 42 cases (42%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Many cases were dismissed due to plaintiffs' inability to present sufficient evidence to support their claims.

Found in 28 cases (28%) Medium Impact

Default in Issuing Notices

Plaintiffs often failed to take necessary steps to issue notices to defendants, leading to case dismissals.

Found in 14 cases (14%) Medium Impact

Absence of Petitioners

Cases frequently ended in dismissal due to the absence of the petitioners during court proceedings.

Found in 10 cases (10%) Low Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Batta Fees

Lack of Evidence Presented

Default in Issuing Notices

Absence of Petitioners

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?