| Niyamam AI

Displaying 13761 - 13765 of 15270

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Kozhippurath Hamza et al vs Parambadan Abdul Nazar et al regarding injunction

Civil Suit - Injunction

ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 60 OF 2013

Tirur

2017-01-19

3 years

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between The Secretary vs Kumbalaparambil Muhammedkutty regarding debt satisfaction

Civil Suit - Debt Satisfaction

EP 188/2016

Tirur, Malappuram

2017-01-19

0 years, 6 months, 1 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Muhammed vs Parayil Moideen Kutty et al regarding injunction

Civil Suit - Injunction

Original Suit No.238 OF 2016

Tirur

2017-01-18

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Namrattu Kizhakkepat Kuttisankaran Nair vs Mannath Moosa et al regarding injunction

Civil Suit - Injunction

ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 173 OF 2012

Tirur

2017-01-18

4 years 11 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Secretary, Edarikkod Service Co operative Bank vs Thirunnavaya Kalathil Hamza et al regarding loan recovery

Execution Petition

EXECUTION PETITION NO. 184 OF 2015

Tirur

2017-01-18

1 year

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

51%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 15,270 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.3 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 807 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 682 cases)
Sale deed (in 574 cases)
Postal receipt (in 543 cases)
Tax receipt (in 530 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 7721
Defendant Won: 6453

6453

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

22%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiff often failed to pay necessary court fees, resulting in case dismissal for default.

Found in 22 cases (22%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Plaintiffs frequently did not provide evidence required to support their claims, leading to dismissals.

Found in 20 cases (20%) High Impact

Absence of the Petitioner

Cases were often dismissed when the plaintiff failed to appear in court during hearings.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

Failure to Issue Notices

Plaintiffs frequently did not take necessary steps to issue required notices to defendants, resulting in dismissals.

Found in 17 cases (17%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Presented

Absence of the Petitioner

Failure to Issue Notices

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?