| Niyamam AI

Displaying 13666 - 13670 of 15270

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Changiliyott Manakkal Madhavan Namboothiri vs Neyyathoor Muneer et al regarding perpetual injunction

Civil Suit - Injunction

ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 198 OF 2015

Tirur

2017-03-24

1 year

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Abdulla vs Muraleedharan regarding property delivery

Execution Petition

EP 2/2017

Tirur, Malappuram

2017-03-24

0 years, 2 months, 19 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Arakkal Musthafa vs Basheer Meenattil regarding dishonour of cheque

Criminal Case - Cheque Dishonour under Section 138 of N.I. Act

S.T. No. 159/2015

Tirur

2017-03-24

2 years

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Canara Bank vs Mohammed Rasheed regarding money realisation

Civil Suit - Money Realisation

ORIGINAL SUIT NO.6 OF 2017

Tirur

2017-03-23

Less than 2 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Kottekkunnu Sree Durga Devi Kshethra Committee et al vs Gopalakrishnan et al regarding injunction.

Injunction

ORIGINAL SUIT NO.154 OF 2016

2019-03-08

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

51%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 15,270 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.3 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 807 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 682 cases)
Sale deed (in 574 cases)
Postal receipt (in 543 cases)
Tax receipt (in 530 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 7721
Defendant Won: 6453

6453

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

22%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs failed to pay the required batta, leading to dismissal for default.

Found in 22 cases (22%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Petitioners could not provide sufficient evidence to support their claims or prove financial means.

Found in 20 cases (20%) High Impact

Failure to Issue Required Notices

Petitioners failed to take necessary steps to issue notices to respondents, resulting in case dismissal.

Found in 16 cases (16%) Medium Impact

Absence of the Petitioner

The petition was dismissed due to the petitioner's absence in court during the hearings.

Found in 12 cases (12%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Presented

Failure to Issue Required Notices

Absence of the Petitioner

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?