| Niyamam AI

Displaying 13611 - 13615 of 15270

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between P. Amina Beevi et al vs P. Ibrahimkutty et al regarding partition

Civil Suit - Partition

ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 286 OF 2012

Tirur

2017-04-10

4 years

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between The Secretary vs Ayyaparambath Aboobacker et al regarding Execution Petition

Execution Petition

EP 236/2015

Tirur, Malappuram

2017-04-10

1 year, 8 months, 6 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Edarikode Service Sahakarana Bank vs Palamthodi Sajikili and Palamthodi Mujeeb regarding repayment of loan

Civil Suit

EP/241/2016

Tirur, Malappuram

2017-04-10

0 years, 5 months, 8 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Edarikode Service Sahakarana Bank vs Palamthodi Shihab et al regarding loan closure

Execution Petition

EP 238/2016

Tirur, Malappuram

2017-04-10

0 years, 5 months, 8 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Ayishakutty vs Saithalikutty regarding property delivery

Execution Proceeding

EP 255/2016

Tirur, Malappuram

2017-04-10

0 years, 4 months, 5 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

51%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 15,270 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.3 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 807 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 682 cases)
Sale deed (in 574 cases)
Postal receipt (in 543 cases)
Tax receipt (in 530 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 7721
Defendant Won: 6453

6453

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

22%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs frequently failed to pay the necessary batta, leading to dismissal of their petitions.

Found in 22 cases (22%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Many cases lacked sufficient evidence supporting the plaintiffs' claims, resulting in dismissal.

Found in 19 cases (19%) High Impact

Absence of the Petitioner

Petition dismissals often occurred due to the absence of the petitioner during court proceedings.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

Failure to Take Required Steps

Plaintiffs often failed to take necessary procedural steps, such as issuing notices, leading to case dismissals.

Found in 14 cases (14%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Presented

Absence of the Petitioner

Failure to Take Required Steps

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?