| Niyamam AI

Displaying 13536 - 13540 of 15270

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Arakkal Veettil Moosa vs Kuroor Hamza et al regarding injunction

Injunction

ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 181 OF 2014

Tirur Taluk

2017-02-08

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Kuroor Hamza et al vs Pandarathoppil Koya's Children et al regarding injunction

Civil Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 420 OF 2014

Tirur Taluk

2017-02-08

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Sri.Amjad.M. regarding EP

Execution Petition

EP 125/2016

Malappuram

2017-02-08

0 years, 8 months, 20 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between The Secretary vs Parammal Haleema regarding Execution Petition

Execution Petition

EP 127/2015

Malappuram

2017-02-08

1 years, 9 months, 29 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Kuttu @ Bava vs Shameermon et al regarding recovery of possession and injunction.

Civil Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 44 OF 2016

Tirur Taluk

2017-02-07

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

51%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 15,270 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.3 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 807 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 682 cases)
Sale deed (in 574 cases)
Postal receipt (in 543 cases)
Tax receipt (in 530 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 7721
Defendant Won: 6453

6453

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

24%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs failed to pay court fees, leading to dismissal of their petitions.

Found in 24 cases (24%) High Impact

Absence of Evidence for Claims

Lack of evidence to support claims led to dismissal in multiple cases.

Found in 23 cases (23%) High Impact

Failure to Take Necessary Steps

Plaintiffs did not take required procedural steps, resulting in case dismissals.

Found in 21 cases (21%) High Impact

Default Due to Non-Representation

Cases were dismissed when plaintiffs failed to appear or be represented in court.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Absence of Evidence for Claims

Failure to Take Necessary Steps

Default Due to Non-Representation

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?